Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Charlottesville Personal Injury LawyerFormer KBR Employees Looking For Day In Court
By Greg Webb
The claims of civilian truck drivers injured or killed in Iraq may finally receive a thorough hearing in court. The drivers at the center of the issue have filed a lawsuit against former employer, Houston-based company KBR. An appeals court decision, sending the case back to the lower court that dismissed it two years ago, may finally give the drivers the chance to get their case heard
The lawsuit was created on behalf of drivers whose fuel convoy was ambushed in April 2004, leaving fifteen drivers injured, six killed and one still missing. The drivers were assured by KBR that they would only be sent into active combat if they had adequate protection. The lawsuit claims KBR knew the convoy would be attacked but dispatched it anyway. KBR, on the other hand, claims it is merely an Army contractor and the Army is responsible for the safety of convoys. T. Scott Allen, a lawyer representing one of the drivers and their families, points out the fact that civilians are being hired for work that used to be handled by the military, yet they are not being given the same protection as soldiers, nor are they given the rights of private employees.
The issue at hand is whether questioning KBR's decision to send drivers into harm's way second-guesses their employer's judgment or whether the questioning challenges military decisions. Military issues cannot be reviewed by a court of law, while workplace issues can. This military issue led to the case not being heard in 2006 because the U.S. District Judge said the court lacked the authority to question military decisions. Recently, however, the appeals court said the claims against KBR can be separated from the issue of the Army's role since the KBR contract does not put the company under the Army's direct supervision. While the case has been sent back for a trial, further appeals might prolong the process. http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/steffy/5810966.html
Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Greg Webb
Full post as published by Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer on June 24, 2008 (boomark / email).
Employee Lawsuits: Negligent Hiring and Retention
Employers must check references, criminal records, other background material.
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Overtime for Programmers
alleging that some companies try to avoid paying employees overtime by categorizing them as "salaried" employees.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Arrow Trucking Hit with Federal Lawsuit by Employees
Arrow Trucking Hit with Federal Lawsuit by Employees
Female Employees Sue Goldman Sachs for Sex Discrimination
Female Employees Sue Goldman Sachs for Sex Discrimination
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.

"Feds question court employees; Probe focuses on relationship between judge, Massey CEO"
Supreme Court OKs Employees' Retaliation Claims
Shocker - U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Employees!
Law: Dealing with tipped employees
Contract Workers as Employees in Texas
Employees May Sue Over 401(k) Mismanagement







