ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Honolulu Personal Injury Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Honolulu Personal Injury Lawyer

Federal Departments and Agencies Announcing Regulations that Pre-empt State Laws Won't Do So Without a Sufficient Legal Basis

By Wayne Parsons

ADVERTISEMENTS

All Americans can celebrate the breaking news regarding a landmark achievement that was announced today in Washington D.C. From now on, the regulatory preemption of state common law will be strictly limited. Even regulations issued within the past 10 years will have to be reviewed and in some cases amended.

This is a major victory for the rights of all Americans under state law.

President Obama issued a Directive to the Heads of all Executive Branch Departments and Agencies stating it is the policy of his Administration that 'preemption of State law by executive departments and agencies should be undertaken only with full consideration of the legitimate prerogatives of the States and with a sufficient legal basis for preemption.' Preemption of state common law will no longer be presumed or asserted by regulatory agencies absent 'explicit preemption by Congress or an otherwise sufficient basis under applicable legal principles.'

In order to ensure that executive departments and agencies include statements of preemption in regulations only when such statements have a sufficient legal basis, the President's directive provides that:

"1. Heads of departments and agencies should not include in regulatory preambles statements that the department or agency intends to preempt State law through the regulation except where preemption provisions are also included in the codified regulation.

2. Heads of departments and agencies should not include preemption provisions in codified regulations except where such provisions would be justified under legal principles governing preemption…

3. Heads of departments and agencies should review regulations issued within the past 10 years that contain statements in regulatory preambles or codified provisions intended by the department or agency to preempt State law, in order to decide whether such statements or provisions are justified under applicable legal principles governing preemption. Where the head of a department or agency determines that a regulatory statement of preemption or codified regulatory provision cannot be so justified, the head of that department or agency should initiate appropriate action, which may include amendment of the relevant regulation.'

This is an enormous victory. It reflects what we believe the law in reality has always been and how it should always have been applied. President Obama is correcting a decade of abuse of the regulatory process and this step signifies a triumph both for states' rights and for the legal rights of all Americans and their families. Please join me in congratulating the President of the United States. I would also note the tireless work by Gerie Voss and the American Association of Justice (AAJ) in helping to make this possible.

I have written on the subject of preemption before:

House lawmakers hear debate over medical device preemption. Tort Reform For Victims of Unsafe Medical Devices: Pass The Medical Device Safety Act of 2009 Federal Preemption Puts Consumers At Risk According To Observers Bush Administration Midnight Regulations On Preemption Take Away Right To Sue

The efforts to use federal regulations to over-rule state law is the ultimate sneak attack on the American citizenry. Hoping that the public is too busy to know what goes on is this obtuse world of complex regulations, the safety and health of the country has been put at risk. why? You guessed it: corporate profits! Companies make more money when they don't have to pay a person who they injure. Preemption does just that. A Get-Out-Of-Jail Free card for the folks in Big Pharma and the world of dangerous products. President Obama has sent out the battle cry. He will need the publics support to make this work. Only with all of you can his efforts succeed. Together we are strong!

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Wayne Parsons

Full post as published by Honolulu Personal Injury Lawyer on May 20, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0024 secs (from cache 10/31/26 22:12:59)