ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer

FDA Rules Regarding Internet Drug Ads Create Confusion

By Greg Webb

ADVERTISEMENTS

Late last month, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sent strong warning letters to fourteen major pharmaceutical companies that the companies' search advertisements, or the short text ads that run beside Google results, have to include risk information about each drug or else be removed. The letter cited examples of Celebrex, Propecia and Yaz, which did not include the precautions that the agency required. The drug manufacturer Merck, for example, was reprimanded by the FDA for making its drug Singulair appear safer than has been demonstrated. Many feel this is sign of increased vigilance in the new FDA administration.

Until the letters were issued, drug companies assumed there was a one-click rule, which required them to publish risk information within one click of their ads, or on the page that the ad linked to. The companies argued that the FDA is ignoring the realities of internet marketing; there is no way they can include all of the required information in the ads because Google only allows ninety-five characters for search ads. While companies are changing their ads to comply with the warning, executives say the solution is worse than the problem; advertisements are now even more misleading. Representatives for the FDA, however, say if there is not adequate risk information, or you overstate the benefit of a drug, that is false advertising; risk information is required on every advertisement no matter the medium.

Drug companies changed almost all of their ads after receiving the letters because they do not want to be on the wrong side of the FDA, however, the sense in the industry was that the letters were just telling what they should and shouldn't do as opposed to giving strict mandates. Online advertisements are now using generic-sounding brand names to redirect to a brand's website. Propecia, for example, now redirects links through a website called 'hair-loss-medication.com' instead of propecia.com.

These solutions have problems, however, in that consumers may think these sites are neutral when they are really redirected to a sales site. In fact, Google will only allow pharmaceutical companies to redirect this way. Consumers will also rarely see the official websites in the sponsored search results and will instead see links to Canadian pharmacies and other unregulated herbal offerings.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Greg Webb

Full post as published by Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer on April 26, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/03/26 09:04:09)