ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patently Obvious

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: Patently Obvious

Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 46: Supreme Court Edition

By Dennis Crouch, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS
  • In re Nuijten: The applicant has filed a petition for certiorari to overturn the Federal Circuit?s decision that a man made signal is not patentable.  Professor Duffy filed a ?law professor? amicus supporting the position which I signed. We argue that the CAFCs Nuijten decision improperly creates a new subject matter exclusion of transitory inventions that cannot be perceived without special equipment.  The AIPLA also filed a brief asking the Supreme Court to hear the case. [Law Professor Brief][AIPLA Brief]. Judge Linn?s dissent in the Nuijten decision may well serve as an additional amicus.
  • Biomedical Patent Management v. California: This case challenges California?s claims to 11th Amendment Soveriegnty based in part on the state?s increased involvement in the business of patenting and commercialization. The Supreme Court is awaiting views from the US Solicitor General on whether the US recommends grant of certiorari.   
  • Translogic v. Dudas: In this case, Translogic asks the Supreme Court to invalidate a BPAI opinion based on the unconstitutional appointment of BPAI judges. In a recent study, I showed that 83% of recent BPAI decisions included at least one judge appointed by the PTO Director rather than the constitutional required ?head of department.?  Translogic has several procedural hurdles.
  • Calmar v. Arminak: The design patent holder asked the Supreme Court to reverse the Federal Circuit?s application of the ?ordinary observer? test that improperly excludes the most natural ordinary observer ? a retail customer. On June 9, the Supreme Court Denied certiorari.

Full post as published by Patently Obvious on June 22, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Blog Posts
Search Blog Directory:

Search Blog Directory:

Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.801 secs (new cache)