Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement UpdatesPatent Litigation
By Philip Brooks
Practising Law Institute (PLI) is hosting "Patent Litigation 2008" in San Francisco (with live webcast) on September 22-23, 2008. The program will also take place in Northern Virginia, Chicago, Atlanta and New York City with October and November dates.
Patent litigation is very expensive, damage awards can be very large and business disruption is a critical risk. Rapid changes in patent law make it necessary, whether you are plaintiff or defendant counsel, to ensure that you are up-to-date on the current state of the law and on how to develop successful litigation strategies and tactics. Patent litigation is a potent tool to protect patents. Damage awards, attorney fees and associated costs can easily run into millions of dollars, potentially closing business operations overnight.
This course is taught by a faculty of judges and lawyers who have earned national reputations in patent litigation by trying a wide variety of bench and jury patent trials, and provides comprehensive coverage of every phase of a patent lawsuit. The program schedule has been revised, based on comments from prior year attendees at this popular annual program.
What You Will Learn
-
New! An expanded opening session focusing on the impact of new case law on patent litigation, including recent Supreme Court and Federal Circuit decisions
-
Understand the evolving issues in claim construction and their effect on proof of infringement
-
How to successfully handle discovery, including e-discovery, in patent litigation
-
How to obtain, and defend against, preliminary and permanent injunctions and declaratory judgments in patent cases post-eBay
-
Opinion Letters, representation issues, the impact of Knorr-Bremse, and willful infringement after Seagate
-
Proving damages and issues to consider when pursuing and defending the damages case in the wake of Microsoft v. AT&T
-
Prosecuting a patent that holds up in litigation
-
The impact of KSR v. Teleflex on obviousness
-
New! One hour of ethics credit for patent litigators
And demonstrations by expert patent litigators:
-
Direct and cross-examination of a technical expert contending for obviousness
-
Closing argument: tips from a patent trial lawyer and a jury consultant
More information, including the faculty for each city, and registration details are available here.
Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on July 07, 2008 (boomark / email).
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
$189 Million Settlement Reached in Slab Litigation
$189 Million Settlement Reached in Slab Litigation
Breakthrough Settlement Reached In Chinese Drywall Litigation
Chinese Drywall Litigation Breakthrough Settlement Reached
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment

Study: Patent Litigation Protects Holders
TexasBarCLE Advanced Patent Litigation Course - Day 1
Patent litigation by the numbers
Litigation management Part III -- intellectual property litigation costs
Survey: The Busiest Patent Firms







