ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patent Docs

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: Patent Docs

The Disappearance of Deceptive Intent in S. 23

By Donald Zuhn, Kevin Noonan, Chris Singer, Sherri Oslick, and Jason Derry

ADVERTISEMENTS
By Kevin E. Noonan -- Nestled unobtrusively in a section of S. 23 called "Technical Amendments," S. 23 (the "America Invents Act") has done something that neither Congress nor any court has been able to do for 80 years: remove (or at least blunt) the duty of candor owed by an applicant to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office during prosecution of a patent application. This bit of legerdemain is accomplished by removing, in almost every instance in which it appears, the requirement that an applicant act "without deceptive intent." These instances include: 35 U.S.C. § 116 regarding joint inventorship...

Full post as published by Patent Docs on March 24, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0036 secs (from cache 10/31/26 03:29:51)