Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Miscellaneous Blogs -> Federal Civil Practice Bulletin
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Miscellaneous
: Federal Civil Practice BulletinFederal Circuit Determines that Remand of Removed Case Based on a District Court's Rejection of Supplemental Jurisdiction Is not Reviewable
By A. Benjamin Spencer
Opening up a circuit split, Judge Arthur J. Gajarsa said that recent U.S. Supreme Court pronouncements on remands undercut other circuits' view that remands based on supplemental jurisdiction are distinguishable from those based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction and therefore fall outside the jurisdictional bar of 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d).
BNA Subscribers may read the full article by clicking here.
Full post as published by Federal Civil Practice Bulletin on November 28, 2007 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
FDA Determines Menaflex Should Not Have Been Cleared for Marketing
Menaflex Collagen Scaffold FDA Says Should not Have Been Cleared
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Search Engine Optimization Claims
Web based company pays over $150,000 settlement in Internet lawsuit.
MRI Health Risks
alleging gadolinium based contrast agents pose health risks.

Appealing a Remand Order, and Intra-Circuit Stare Decisis
CAFA Intrigue (Pew v. Cardarelli)
Fifth Circuit Clarifies Post-Confirmation Jurisdiction
Is Patent Law Legal Malpractice always a Federal Question








