Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Point of Law
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: Point of LawKnipe v. SmithKline Beecham: Paxil and pre-emption
By Walter Olson
ADVERTISEMENTS
A Philadelphia federal court has issued a decision that, in contrast to much recent jurisprudence, resolved FDA pre-emption issues favorably to tort plaintiffs. Beck and Herrmann sort out the significance. The case was one blaming the antidepressant Paxil for a...Full post as published by Point of Law on September 09, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Lawsuits and Settlements
Paxil Heart Defects
alleging Paxil causes heart defects in newborns.
Paxil
Found to Damage Sperm and Inhibit Fertility
GSK Paxil
Proposed $28 Million Settlement Reached
Paxil Birth Defects
alleging link to the birth defect persistant pulmonary hypertention in the newborn (PPHN) and infant death.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Philly Judge: No Preemption in a Paxil Case
USPTO Files Opening Brief in Tafas v. Dudas Appeal
Smithkline Beecham v. Dudas Seminar
Tafas v. Dudas; SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Dudas - USPTO Denied Summary Judgement.
Case: Tafas v. Dudas (USPTO rules)







