Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Patent Arcade
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Patent ArcadeCase: Tafas v. Dudas (USPTO rules)
By Ross Dannenberg (Gamertag: Aviator)
Read the opinion here:
GSKSummJudgOPINION.pdf
The case is: Tafas v. Dudas, Docket No. 1:07cv846, as combined with Smithkline Beecham Corporation v. Dudas, Docket No. 1:07cv1008, in the Eastern District of Virginia, before judge Cacheris.
Now we wait to see if there is an appeal...
Full post as published by Patent Arcade on April 01, 2008 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Gleevec
Possible Case of Kidney Damage Reported
Hampton Inn
Third Case of Legionnaires' Disease Linked to McHenry Hampton Inn Hot Tub
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Female Sales Reps Win Gender Case Against Novartis
Female Sales Reps Win Gender Case Against Novartis

Tafas v. Dudas: The Continuation Wars
Tafas v. Dudas; SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Dudas - Hearing Today.
Tafas v. Dudas: USPTO Exceded Its Rulemaking Authority with Proposed Limitations on Continuations
Feb. 8: oral arguments in Tafas v. Dudas
Briefs Flying In Patent Office Appeal of Continuation Rules
TAFAS v. DUDAS: PTO Asks CAFC To Allow Office to Implement Limits on Continuations and Claims








