Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> LawPundit
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: LawPunditWLF Hosting Web Seminar on SmithKline Beecham v. Dudas: Challenging the Patent Office?s ?Continuations? Rule and the Suit?s Repercussions
By Andis Kaulins
" I am writing to notify you of an event The Washington Legal Foundation (WLF) is hosting ... a WLF Web Seminar Series featuring two distinguished attorneys involved with the case on February 5, 2008. The topic is ?Smithkline Beecham v. Dudas: Challenging the Patent Office?s ?Continuations? rule and the suit?s repercussions.?
Mr. Mark Fox Evens is Director with the Washington, D.C. law firm of Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein, & Fox PLLC. Mr. Evens represented four research and development licensing companies in an amicus curiae brief filed in Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Dudas. Mr. Richard C. Pettus is a Partner in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the New York office of King & Spalding. Mr. Pettus? firm represented HEXAS LLC, The Roskamp Institute, and Tikvah Therapeutics in an amicus curiae brief filed in Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Dudas.
Our experts will provide an overview of the pending legal challenge and an analysis of the preliminary injunction ruling in the case. They will also provide an assessment of the merit briefs, amicus briefs and the impending federal court hearing set for February 8, 2008. The speakers will discuss the impact of the challenge on patent holders, the patent system, and the American public and will conclude with commentary on the interplay between the Smithkline case and legislative patent reform.
This program will be available online via live webcast at www.wlf.org, and will be archived for future viewing and available as a downloadable read-only file. There is always the ability to ask questions of the speakers in real time by emailing us at interactive@wlf.org during the program."
[Online links added by LawPundit]
Full post as published by LawPundit on February 01, 2008 (boomark / email).
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
OfficeMax Recalls Office Chairs Due to Fall Hazard
OfficeMax Recalls Office Chairs Due to Fall Hazard
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.

Smithkline Beecham v. Dudas Seminar
USPTO Files Opening Brief in Tafas v. Dudas Appeal
Tafas v. Dudas; SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Dudas - USPTO Denied Summary Judgement.
Tafas v. Dudas; SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Dudas - Hearing Today.
Dr. Tafas Files Brief in New Rules Appeal
Case: Tafas v. Dudas (USPTO rules)








