Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Legal Pad | LA
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: Legal Pad | LAWater-saving lawn removal at odds with OC codes
By Richard Binder
The road to litigation is sometimes paved with good intentions - and wood chips.
Two years ago Quan and Angelina Ha tore out the grass in their frontyard. As far as they were concerned, their reasoning was sound: the grass soaked up tens of thousands of gallons of water, and therefore hundreds of dollars, each year. So, in drought-afflicted California, the grass had to go.
But city officials informed them that they were violating several city laws that require residents to cover significant ports of their front lawns with live ground cover. City codes mandate that 40% of a yard be landscaped predominantly with live plants, so the Has' original fix of covering the dirt with wood chips was unacceptable. They also built a fence and planted drought-resistant greenery, like lavender and rosemary. Still not good enough for the city.
Two months ago, the Has received a letter from the city informing them they had been charged with with misdemeanor code violations and must appear in court. Tomorrow the Has will appear in Orange County Superior Court to challenge the suit.
Did their water-saving scheme work, though? Click here for details.
Full post as published by Legal Pad | LA on March 02, 2010 (boomark / email).
New York Building Codes
Building and constructions laws in New York
Building Codes
National, local, and municipal building code sources
Ivy Lawn
alleging employees informed grave robbers of valuables buried with loved ones.
Veolia Water
allegedly overestimated water usage for residential customers.
Chocolate Discharge
G.K.I. Foods agrees to $43,000 settlement after disposing production waste water into a sanitary waste water system.
Gaiam Water Bottles Containing BPA
Gaiam Bottles alleging water bottles contain BPA even though they were marketed as not containing Bisphenol A.
SIGG Admits to Trace BPA in Metal Water Bottles
SIGG Admits to BPA in Metal Water Bottles
Nestle
Pure Life Water Recall

Removal of UPC Codes Constitutes Trademark Infringement
Authority of Clean Water Act at Odds With Supreme Court Decisions
Report and Class Action Suit: Weed Killer in Local Drinking Water
Couple Sued for Removing Lawn to Save Water








