ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> The Legal Intelligencer Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: The Legal Intelligencer Blog

Punishment of School District Not 'Appropriate' Relief Under IDEA

By Brian Harris

ADVERTISEMENTS

 
By Wendy Beetlestone

Special to the Legal

In C.W. v. The Rose Tree Media School District, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was asked to define the contours of "appropriate" relief for violations of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).

The parents of a disabled child had placed the child in a private school after they had requested an evaluation by the school district but before their request for a due process hearing was acted upon more than two years later. The parents alleged that the extended delay between the request for a due process hearing and the ultimate resolution of their dispute with the school district was so egregiously prolonged that an award of tuition reimbursement or compensatory education was "appropriate" under IDEA. 

The 3rd Circuit concluded that despite the broad discretion given to courts to craft remedies for violations of the IDEA, reimbursement for private school fees was appropriate only if both the public placement violated the IDEA and the private school placement was proper under the IDEA.

In this case, the district had offered the student a free appropriate public education. The fact that there was an extended delay in implementing the individualized education program (IEP) had no relevance to the appropriateness of the education offered to the student. Punishment of the district by requiring reimbursement of tuition did not advance the goal of providing education to those with disabilities and was, therefore, inappropriate. 

Similarly, the student was not eligible for compensatory education because compensatory education is designed to compensate students with disabilities who have not received an appropriate education, not to punish schools for failing to follow the established procedures for providing such an education.

Profiles_beetlestone_wendy  Wendy Beetlestone is a shareholder at Hangley Aronchick Segal & Pudlin, where she is chair of the firm's education practice group. She is also the 3rd Circuit reporter for the School Law Reporter, which will publish this entry. She can be reached at wzb@hangley.com

 

Full post as published by The Legal Intelligencer Blog on March 11, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0034 secs (from cache 10/31/26 02:13:42)