ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Mobile-Phone Programmer Wins Rights to ?March Madness?

By Dan Slater

ADVERTISEMENTS

marchAll kinds of new things are happening in college hoops. The three-point line is getting moved back to 20 feet 9 inches, all four number one seeds made it to the Final Four for the first time in history, and a non-NCAA affiliate has won the right to use March Madness in its programming. (Here’s a post from way back on Friday on the NCAA’s success in defending its trademark.)

The Law Blog just got word from Intersport, a sports and entertainment programmer that produces college basketball for CBS and ESPN, that an Illinois appellate court has affirmed the company’s rights to use the term “March Madness” in connection with its original made-for-mobile programming. Here’s the opinion.

According to the press release, years ago Intersport assigned its trademark on the phrase “March Madness” to the Illinois High School Association in exchange for a royalty stream. Two years ago, in response to threats from the NCAA, Intersport filed suit in the Circuit Court of Cook County, seeking a declaratory judgment to affirm its rights in relation to the March Madness trademark. Intersport had wanted to use the term through a deal with mobile-services provider Sprint. Following a year-long court battle, the Circuit Court ruled in favor of Intersport.

On appeal, the Appellate Court has now confirmed Intersport’s exclusive rights to distribute such programming to the public in any manner, including via mobile wireless devices.

We called Scott Kline of Andrews & Kurth in Dallas. In 2003, Kline represented the NCAA in a different “March Madness” infringement suit. A Texas district court ruled in favor of the NCAA and the Illinois High School Association in its suit against Netfire, a sports marketing group, holding that the term “March Madness” is not generic.

Kline told the Law Blog that the decision raises interesting issues about the nexus of sports programming and cell-phone technology: “There’s always been a fair amount of disagreement on the way that the Intersport license would coincide with the NCAA’s March Madness rights,” said Kline. “Intersport has a unique, exclusive license that applies to a specific range of [broadcasting] distribution rights.”

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on December 31, 1969 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0024 secs (from cache 10/31/26 08:23:41)