Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: Law Blog - WSJ.comMobile-Phone Programmer Wins Rights to ?March Madness?
By Dan Slater
All kinds of new things are happening in college hoops. The three-point line is getting moved back to 20 feet 9 inches, all four number one seeds made it to the Final Four for the first time in history, and a non-NCAA affiliate has won the right to use March Madness in its programming. (Here’s a post from way back on Friday on the NCAA’s success in defending its trademark.)
The Law Blog just got word from Intersport, a sports and entertainment programmer that produces college basketball for CBS and ESPN, that an Illinois appellate court has affirmed the company’s rights to use the term “March Madness” in connection with its original made-for-mobile programming. Here’s the opinion.
According to the press release, years ago Intersport assigned its trademark on the phrase “March Madness” to the Illinois High School Association in exchange for a royalty stream. Two years ago, in response to threats from the NCAA, Intersport filed suit in the Circuit Court of Cook County, seeking a declaratory judgment to affirm its rights in relation to the March Madness trademark. Intersport had wanted to use the term through a deal with mobile-services provider Sprint. Following a year-long court battle, the Circuit Court ruled in favor of Intersport.
On appeal, the Appellate Court has now confirmed Intersport’s exclusive rights to distribute such programming to the public in any manner, including via mobile wireless devices.
We called Scott Kline of Andrews & Kurth in Dallas. In 2003, Kline represented the NCAA in a different “March Madness” infringement suit. A Texas district court ruled in favor of the NCAA and the Illinois High School Association in its suit against Netfire, a sports marketing group, holding that the term “March Madness” is not generic.
Kline told the Law Blog that the decision raises interesting issues about the nexus of sports programming and cell-phone technology: “There’s always been a fair amount of disagreement on the way that the Intersport license would coincide with the NCAA’s March Madness rights,” said Kline. “Intersport has a unique, exclusive license that applies to a specific range of [broadcasting] distribution rights.”
Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on December 31, 1969 (boomark / email).
Cell Phone Early Termination Fees
How to recover billing errors
DC Madame Phone List
Telephone Records of Deborah Jeane Palfrey's Escort Service (Pamela Martin and Associates)
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
State Will Statutes
State Differences in Last Will and Testament Checklist
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
T-mobile data plans, T-mobile, t-mobile phones
T-Mobile Faces Class Action over Limited Unlimited Data Plans
Media/Telecom
consumer rights involving print, radio, television, video, DVD, video games, and mobile telephones.
New Study Links Cell Phone Radiation to Increased Health Risks
Cell Phone Radiation Is Your Phone Toxic?
Sprint Nextel, T-Mobile, Verizon and Alltel
allegedly charging customers for unauthorized mobile content
Rally Rights
Gettysburg Borough awards arrested protester $22,500 civil rights settlement.
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.

And What Would March Be Without A March Madness Post
Mobile Phone Functionality Added to LawPundit (in the USA only)
Do you suffer from "Nomophobia"
Volokh March Madness Finals.--








