Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> JURIST - The Paper Chase

Legal News

: JURIST - The Paper Chase

Federal appeals court to rehear patent rules challenge

By Bernard Hibbitts (editor) and University of Pittsburgh School of Law students.

[JURIST] A federal appeals court on Monday ordered an en banc rehearing of a patent case that challenges new US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) rules. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will reexamine a previous ruling that upheld three of the rules but rejected a fourth after all four were struck down by a district court. The rules upheld would limit the number of times that someone can request a re-examination of a patent and require applicants with several claims to submit additional materials among other provisions aimed to address the "large and growing backlog of unexamined patent applications." The three-judge panel for the court rejected one rule that requires a person pursuing more than two continuation applications to file a petition showing that the added information could not have been provided previously, removing all references to the prior application if the requisite showing is not made. The panel ruled that this fourth rule was inconsistent with 35 USC § 120, which entitles patent applicants to use the filing date of the previously-filed application. The original action was brought by plaintiffs Smithkline Beecham Corporation, doing business as GlaxoSmithKline, and Dr. Triantafyllos Tafas against the PTO and the office's former director Jon Dudas. In addition to rules aimed at slowing down the influx of applications, the scope of patentable subject matter may affect the number of patents being filed in the future. In June, the US Supreme Court granted certiorari in the controversial case of Bilski v. Doll to review the scope of patentable subject matter. In Bilski, the Court will rule on the rejection of a business method patent that sought to protect a method of hedging risks in commodities trading. The Federal Circuit narrowly defined the "machine-or-transformation" test to be used in determining business method patent eligibility.

Full post as published by JURIST - The Paper Chase on July 07, 2009 (boomark / email).