Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Students Blogs -> Law Vibe
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Law Students
: Law VibeInvasion of Privacy With a Hidden Camera: Employer and Employee Law
By C. C.
Hoping to capture an evening intruder who surfed the Internet and viewed pornography on a work computer, a company installed a hidden camera to monitor the computer. The hidden camera was not turned on during the day when the employees were present – just at night in the hopes of catching the culprit.
The employees, however, spotted a flashing red light on the camera during the day, discovered the camera and then sued for invasion of privacy. The employer had not disclosed to the daytime workers that it had installed the hidden camera pointed at the employees’ computers. The employer did not suspect the employees.
Now here’s the rub: employees have an expectation of privacy in the workplace. Why? Well, that’s the law, although it seems to this writer that such a right is fairly minimal because it’s a work environment, after all, not a home. But then again, I’m from Orange County, not the greater part of the State of California where such rights are taken for granted.
But I’m getting off track.
In our case, Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc., the California Supreme Court held that a privacy violation based on intrusion would require that the employer “intentionally intrude[d] into a place…to which plaintiff has a reasonable expectation of privacy.”
The Court also reasoned that “the intrusion must occur in a manner highly offensive to a reasonable person.” While the Court acknowledged that employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a “solo office [with] relative seclusion,” however, in order to state a claim against an employer, the intrusion must be “sufficiently serious and unwarranted…to constitute an egregious breach of the social norms.”
Now there’s a definitive rule for you. It depends on the circumstances.
The safest way to install a hidden camera is to do so only after disclosing it to the employees and have them acknowledge that the employer has done so and that they have no reasonable expectation of privacy. Otherwise, employers just may get sued.
[thanks to j. craig williams via cc]
Related Posts:
- How the Viacom and YouTube Lawsuits Target User Privacy
- Privacy Policy Lawsuit Leads to Multimillion Lanham Act Award
- Homeowner’s Association & Property Manager Gets Sued Because of Unlicensed Contractor
- Does Adobe’s End User License Agreement Allow Them To Audit Your Computer?
- Facebook Will Keep Your Content Forever
Full post as published by Law Vibe on October 05, 2009 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Employee Lawsuits (An Introduction and Topic Overview)
How employers can cope with the siege of employee lawsuits
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Employee Lawsuits: Negligent Hiring and Retention
Employers must check references, criminal records, other background material.
Landlord Entry Right and Tenant Privacy
When can a landlord enter a rented dwelling
Restaurant Staff
Win Lawsuit Suit Against Employer for Infiltrating their MySpace Forum
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
AOL Privacy Class Action
Can Proceed
CVS Mailing
Sparks Allegations of Privacy Violation
Prepaid Debit Card
alleging hidden prepaid debit card fees.
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.

Privacy a Concern for Both Sides in California Labor Law
"Hidden Camera Case Turns on Expectation of Privacy in Workplace"
Court Dismisses Workers Hidden Camera Suit
Hidden spy camera to catch fly-tippers is taken to rubbish dump








