Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Australian Regulatory Compliance Review
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Australian Regulatory Compliance ReviewAccess to share registers and predatory share offers
David Tweed and his Direct Share Purchasing Corporation Pty Ltd have been involved in 2 decisions related to the practice of unsolicited direct offers to listed company shareholders to purchase shares below market price or over a long period or on other unfavourable terms.
In Tweed and Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2008] AATA 514 the Administrative Appeals Tribunal reviewed Mr Tweed's history leading up to ASIC's permanent banning of Mr Tweed from providing financial services. The AAT decided that the order would be of no effect in respect of Tweed's companies' activities and set it aside.
In Direct Share Purchasing Corporation Pty Ltd v AXA Asia Pacific Holdings Ltd [2008] FCA 935 the Federal Court reviewed the fee Direct Share Purchasing Corporation was obliged to pay Axa for a copy of its member share register (which was managed by Computershare).
AXA charged a fee of $17,195.39 for providing a CD Rom containing a PDF copy of the member register (rather than an Excel file as Direct Share requested). The file format was not an issue.
"Section 173(3) provides the company must give a person a copy of the register (or a part of the register) if a person asks for a copy and "pays any fee (up to the prescribed amount) required by the company". The Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth) (the Regulations) specify that in the case of a register kept on a computer the fee that can be charged is "a reasonable amount that does not exceed the marginal cost to the company of providing a copy": reg 1.1.01 and sch 4, item 3(b). In other words, the fee must satisfy two conditions: (1) it must be a reasonable amount; and (2) the amount must not exceed the marginal cost to the company of providing a copy of the register."
The Court decided that a reasonable fee was $250 and ordered Axa to refund the difference.
Full post as published by Australian Regulatory Compliance Review on June 24, 2008 (boomark / email).
Network Solutions and ICANN
allegedly registers searched domain names to prevent others from selling and forces customers to pay expensive fees.
TransUnion
Class action credit practices suit offers free credit monitoring services for millions.
Getty Images
Faces Class Action over Premium Access
Microsoft Corp.
allegedly failed to provide adequate access and service to Xbox Live and its subscribers.
Disability Access
Developers pay $175,000 settlement for failing to comply with the Fair Housing Act.
Access Roads
Developer Bob Honts agrees to $250,000 property development settlement.

CTJ: Assessment of "Fair Share" of Tax Burden Must Include Payroll Taxes
Google (yawn) Tops Lastest Search Market Share Figures
The Law and Economics of Predatory Pricing









