Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep Links
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep LinksU.S. Patent Office Rejects All Twenty Claims of Subdomain Patent
By michael
More good news for EFF's Patent Busting Project! Last week, the United States Patent Office (PTO) rejected all twenty claims of the Internet subdomain patent [PDF] on the Project's Ten Most Wanted list. Based on a combination of prior art that EFF had supplied and similar Internet newsgroup postings, the PTO concluded that the ideas claimed by the patent were obvious and, therefore, unpatentable.
The patent essentially attempted to claim ownership of the idea of virtual subdomains. But that idea was well known long before the patent issued. For example, over a year before the patent application was filed, members of the Apache developer mailing list were discussing how best to create virtual subdomains.
When we first looked at this patent, it was owned by a self-proclaimed "intellectual property holding company" called Ideaflood. Ideaflood used the illegitimate patent to threaten a wide variety of sites, including Freehomepage.com, T35 Hosting, and LiveJournal. Ideaflood also sued Google in one case and About.com and several other companies in a second case, claiming infringement of the subdomain patent. The case against Google was dismissed shortly after being filed, while the case against About.com was settled shortly after the defendants filed a motion seeking summary judgment and their attorneys' fees. The patent has since been reassigned to Hoshiko, LLC.
Now that the patent office has said the patent claims weren't novel, Hoshiko can try to convince the PTO to change its mind; amend its claims to narrow them while arguing that the narrower claims were non-obvious even if the original claims weren't; or give up on this patent. Let's hope Hoshiko will take the latter approach.
(For more about the next steps, you can take a look at the flowchart we included as an appendix to our white paper on the reexamination process.)
Full post as published by Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep Links on January 21, 2009 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment
Qualcomm Settles Patent Suit for $891 Million
The Princeton Review
$2.6 million settlement reached in patent infringement case.

Re-exam of Tessara's 5,852,326
New Law #1: A setback at the Patent Office for BlackBoard
USPTO Rejects Blackboard's E-Learning Patents
Netherlands to Phase-out Six-year Patent
USPTO Rejects SYMBICORT Patent Extension







