Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> TinytechIP
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: TinytechIPUS Patent 7892817 - Magnetic nanoparticle biosensor
This patent from Philips Electronics teaches using the detection of nanoparticle rotational movement to achieve 3D resolution imaging of molecules. Claim 1 reads:
1. A sensor device for distinguishing a specific binding from a less specific binding between at least one polarizable or polarized nanoparticle label and a surface of another entity, the sensor device comprising:
at least one electric or magnetic field generator for applying an electric or a magnetic field to a sample fluid containing polarized or polarizable nanoparticle labels; at least one magnetic sensor element; and
a detector for detecting a parameter related to nanoparticle rotational or motional freedom while the nanoparticle labels are attached to the surface for distinguishing a specific binding from a less specific binding between said nanoparticle labels and the surface of the other entity,
wherein the electric or magnetic field generator generates a rotating magnetic field.
Full post as published by TinytechIP on February 23, 2011 (boomark / email).
Magnetic Toy Recall
(magnets may detatch)
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment

Drafting "consisting essentially of" claims to overcome unknown anticipatory prior art
MRI Health Risks Have Little To Do With Magnetic Personality
When is a disclosure document required for fundraising
Advanced Magnetic Closures v. Rome Fastener







