Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IPKat
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IPKatPharma Nightmare: Falling off the Patent Cliff
By Johanna Gibson, David Pearce, Jeremy Phillips and Ilanah Simon.
A press release, dramatically entitled "Pharma Industry Enters Critical Phase as Patent Cliff Looms Large, Hastening Consolidation", paints a bleak picture of confidence in the short-term future of the proprietary pharma sector. The headline news is that? More than 8 in 10 (82 per cent) of those working in the drugs industry believe big pharma will be unable to innovate sufficiently from within to replace blockbuster drugs going off-patent;All this is according to the latest annual life sciences research from UK-based international IP practice Marks & Clerk. Its findings, based on a survey of 381 executives [how the Kat dislikes this word: can we have a clue concerning job descriptions please?] across the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, shows that big pharma is becoming increasingly reliant on patent term extensions to safeguard essential blockbuster revenue ahead of a likely ?make-or-break? round of company acquisitions. Not surprisingly, there is some gloom at the challenge facing originator pharmaceutical companies, since large numbers of their blockbuster drugs are set to come off-patent between now and 2014.
? 97 per cent expect that patent life extensions will continue to grow in importance as companies seek to squeeze out revenue streams as blockbusters come up against the patent cliff;
? Almost 7 in 10 (67 per cent) predict substantial acquisition activity within the next two years.
The IPKat's not sure that originator pharma companies will be more interested in securing supplementary protection certificates and paediatric extensions than they have been in the past, since they have always been highly interested in them -- but he agrees that they will be more dependent on the income stream they provide. However, the more valuable those income streams are for their owners, the greater is the gain to be secured by challenging their validity per se as well as seeking to undermine the patents on which they are based, so this is probably good news for pharma patent litigators [For further reading and current news on SPCs, see The SPC Blog].
Full post as published by IPKat on May 16, 2010 (boomark / email).
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Medical Records
To Stay out of Pharma's Hands
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Bridge Painter
Aetna Bridge Co. pays painter $5.5 million personal injury settlement after falling 55 feet onto concrete.
Falling Tree
City of Anaheim pays $700,000 wrongful death settlement after tree crushes a man to death while in his van.

C5 "Pharma Patent Lifecycles" Conference, London, June 26-27
Predictions Dire for U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry
Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation Conference
New District of Delaware Intellectual Property Filings
Biotech/Pharma Lobbying Scoreboard - Part II









