ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Trademark Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Trademark Blog"Hearst Sues Over Use of COSMOPOLITAN Name"
By Marty Schwimmer
ADVERTISEMENTS
Reuters: "Hearst Sues Over Use of Cosmopolitan Name":
Hearst Corp filed a $500,000 trademark infringement lawsuit on Monday against the developers of a $3 billion Las Vegas resort and casino using the same name as the publisher's well-known Cosmopolitan women's magazine. . . . The defendants, Cosmo Senior Borrower LLC and 3700 Associates LLC, are developing the Cosmopolitan Resort Casino, scheduled to open in Las Vegas in 2010 . . . In its complaint, Hearst said that beginning in September 2004 the defendants had secured or applied to register for some two dozen trademarks using Cosmopolitan or Cosmo.
Las Vegas Trademark Lawyer commentary here, noting that Hearst and the resort had tangled previously in the TTAB.
Full post as published by Trademark Blog on June 22, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Amazon
Teen Sues over Lost Homework
Exploding iPod Touch
Mother of Injured Boy Sues Apple
Oscar Winner Sues Production Company
Ascendant pays Kevin Costner undisclosed amount in settlement.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

How Vernonica Hearst is coping with her inheritance
San Francisco Lawyers - Top US Firm
Las Vegas Cosmopolitan Resort & Casino gets a taste of its own trademark medicine
Hearst v. Hearst and Legal Malpractice








