ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IP Blawg

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: IP Blawg

The Battle Between TiVo and Echostar Picks Up The Pace

By Farella Braun + Martel LLP

ADVERTISEMENTS

The action is fast and furious in the patent dispute between digital video recording developer TiVo and satellite communications giant Echostar Communications. First, last week the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a permanent injunction prohibiting Echostar from ?making, using, offering to sell or selling? products that permit the recording of television programs by the method claimed in TiVo?s patent. The very next day, the Federal Circuit temporarily stayed the injunction until it can consider Echostar?s motion for a stay during the entire pendency of its appeal of the district court?s judgment.

This dispute began in January 2004 when TiVo filed suit against Echostar, alleging that Echostar?s digital recording system infringed its patent. In April of this year, a jury found that Echostar had willfully infringed TiVo?s patent and awarded TiVo almost $74 million in damages. Following the jury verdict, TiVo moved for treble damages, attorneys? fees and a permanent injunction. Judge David Folsom of the Eastern District of Texas denied TiVo?s request for treble damages and attorneys? fees, but increased the award to more than $89 million by adding $5.4 million for prejudgment interest and $10.3 million for ?supplemental damages.? Most significantly, the court also entered a broad injunction that not only barred Echostar from selling its infringing video recording feature as part of its satellite receiver products, but also directed Echostar to ?disable the DVR functionality? in substantially all of its receivers already in place.

Echostar immediately asked the Federal Circuit to stay the injunction. The Federal Circuit granted Echostar?s request by granting a ?temporary? stay and giving TiVo five days to respond. The permanent injunction issued by the district court will receive a careful review by the Federal Circuit, both in deciding Echostar?s motion for a stay and as part of Echostar?s appeal of the district court?s judgment. This case could thus be one of the first opportunities for the Federal Circuit to apply the guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court in its decision earlier this year in Ebay v. MercExchange.

Stay tuned. It should make for interesting viewing.

Today's Blogger: Bob Sloss

Full post as published by IP Blawg on August 21, 2006 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 10/31/26 09:42:49)