Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Indiana Blogs -> Indiana Civil & Business Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Indiana
: Indiana Civil & Business LawyerIndiana Court of Appeals Decides Man Incompetent and So Is His Contract
The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed a neighbor of a mentally ill man shouldn't have been able to purchase the man's farm because the man was incompetent when he signed the sales contract.In James Nichols v. Estate of Ernest M Tyler, No. 45A04-0811-CV-640, the appellate court determined the trial court didn't err when it concluded Ernest Tyler was incompetent in February 2005 to convey his farm nor did it err by determining James Nichols failed to rebut the presumption of undue influence over Tyler with regard to the real property transfer.
I cannot but help raise my eyebrows at the fact that the attorney who drew up the Power of Attorney did not question Tyler's competency.
Meanwhile, looking at the actual opinion, there are some very important facts left out of the news report (pages 2 -3 of the opinion):
In March 2002, with the assistance of Shuster, Tyler formed a revocable living trust and transferred to the trust the real estate, including a 124 acre farm and a farmhouse valued together at about $1.5 million, which he had inherited from his mother. Nichols was the trustee of the trust and Tyler was the sole beneficiary. On February 8, 2005, Tyler signed a Direction to Sign Contract for Conditional Sale of Real Estate (the ?Contract?), directing Nichols as trustee to sell his real estate held in trust to Nichols. Nichols took the property by another trust which he formed. Under the terms of the Contract, Tyler retained a life estate in the property, and Nichols was required to pay Tyler $200 per month until Tyler?s death. Nichols was also responsible for paying all taxes, assessments, and insurance with respect to the property. Throughout the dealings between Tyler, Nichols, and Shuster, Shuster was never made aware of Tyler?s mental health history.

Full post as published by Indiana Civil & Business Lawyer on July 29, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Uniform Commercial Code and Contracts
Interstate commercial transactions and sale of goods in the United States
Employment Contracts
General Contract Law Principles
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Philip Morris
Jury Decides Against Big Tobacco
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
AnchorBank
$1.27 million in construction contract termination lawsuit.
Ram Publishing
alleging phone book advertising contract fraud.
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.

Ind. Decisions - 7th Circuit decides one Indiana case today
Ind. Decisions - "Appeals court again rejects sentence for 1992 murder"
Indiana appeals court partially overturns sex offender residence law
Ind. Decisions - Appeals court reduces ex-stripper's prison sentence
Ind. Decisions - More on SCOTUS decides Indiana v. Edwards







