Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ethics
: Legal Ethics ForumUsing the closing argument to fight the in limines and to suggest what had been excluded
ADVERTISEMENTS
In STATE v. CIFUENTES-VICENTE, the Court of Appeals of Washington upheld two $250 sanctions against criminal defense counsel for suggesting to the jury what they might have heard if the judge hadn't excluded certain lines of questioning and for speaking objections. The opinion has extended transcripts of what counsel said, so the case might be useful for discussing the ethics of trial rhetoric. ("[Counsel] said [to the jury] that she was unable to bring out motivations of the accusers 'because of the rules of this court.'")
Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on August 26, 2010 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Hurricane Ike
Gulf Coast Residents Fight for Compensation
Jevic Transportation
allegedly failing to give 60 days warning before closing plant.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

THE GREATEST CLOSING ARGUMENT IN KY. JUDICIAL HISTORY
Lawyer should get an "F" in History for his Closing Argument
Revisiting the Meaning of Closing
More Inflammatory Closing Argument








