Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Estate Planning Blogs -> North Carolina Estate Planning Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Estate Planning
: North Carolina Estate Planning BlogVeterans Victory in the Supreme Court
By Kristin L. Burrows
David Henderson was a Korean War veteran. He was discharged from active duty in 1952 due to paranoid schizophrenia. In 1992, the VA gave him a 100% disability rating, and in 2001 (while living in North Carolina) he filed a claim for supplemental benefits to help with the cost of in-home care related to his severe mental illness. His claim for disability benefits was denied, and he was given 120 days to appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims ('Veterans Court'). He missed the deadline by 15 days and lost his right to appeal.
Henderson argued he was late filing his appeal because he was bedridden due to his service-related disability. The Supreme Court reviewed the case to determine whether the Veterans Court is allowed to make exceptions and extend filing deadlines for disability-related and other equitable reasons. In a unanimous decision issued on March 1, the Supreme Court Justices held that Henderson should not have automatically lost his right to appeal, and that the Veterans Court can make exceptions to the deadline for equitable reasons.
In making its decision, the Court found that the 120-day deadline for appeals to the Veterans Court should not be applied as rigidly as deadlines in civil court cases. This is because veterans claims are different than civil litigation. The veterans' claims process is largely non-adversarial, and Veterans Courts were created by Congress as part of a unique administrative scheme for the adjudication of those claims. Further, veterans are entitled to special protections. As Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the court opinion, 'The VA is charged with the responsibility of assisting veterans in developing evidence that supports their claims, and in evaluating that evidence, the VA must give the veteran the benefit of any doubt. ... Rigid jurisdictional treatment of the 120-day period for filing a notice of appeal in the Veterans Court would clash sharply with this scheme.'
AARP reports that the Veterans Court has dismissed more than 200 cases like Henderson's since 2008, and that more than half of all veterans who file claims do so without legal representation.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-1036.pdf
Full post as published by North Carolina Estate Planning Blog on March 04, 2011 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Military Veterans Benefits
How to obtain full range of benefits for veterans and dependnets
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Military Veterans Benefits, Part 4
Where to get help
Prudential veterans' lawsuit
Families of Deceased Veterans Sue Prudential
CIA
Department of Defense Sued by Veterans
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Proposed $20 Million Settlement
for Veterans' Data Theft Class Action
PTDS class action
Veterans Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Class Action

Rees Lloyd: American Legion fight to preserve memorial began in Banning
ACLU defeated in Mojave Desert veterans memorial cross case
Justices Make it Harder for Vets to Challenge Denied Claims
Vets Make Memorial Day Plea to Supreme Court
Supreme Court: Mojave Desert veterans cross stays!







