Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Election-Campaign Law Blogs -> Election Updates

Election-Campaign Law

: Election Updates

Christopher Hitchen's on the Iowa Caucus Election Process

The fun of reading Christopher Hitchens is that he is so mild, so demur, so lacking in scathing prose (just as I sometimes lack sarcasm). Here is what he wrote today in Slate.com about the Iowa Caucuses (the whole story is linked above).

It is quite astonishing to see with what deadpan and neutral a tone our press and television report the open corruption?and the flagrantly anti-democratic character?of the Iowa caucuses. It's not enough that we have to read of inducements openly offered to potential supporters?I almost said "voters"?even if these mini-bribes only take the form of "platters of sandwiches" and "novelty items" (I am quoting from Sunday's New York Times). It's also that campaign aides are showing up at Iowan homes "with DVD's that [explain] how the caucuses work." Nobody needs a DVD to understand one-person-one-vote, a level playing field, and a secret ballot. The DVD and the other gifts and goodies (Sen. Barack Obama is promising free baby-sitting on Thursday) are required precisely because none of those conditions applies in Iowa. In a genuine democratic process, these Tammany tactics would long ago have been declared illegal. But this is not a democratic process, and besides, as my old friend Michael Kinsley used to say about Washington, the scandal is never about what's illegal. It's about what's legal.

He then notes that:

It's only when you read an honest reporter like Dan Balz that you appreciate the depth and extent of the fraud that is being practiced on us all. "In a primary," as he put it, "voters quietly fill out their ballots and leave. In the caucuses, they are required to come and stay for several hours, and there are no secret ballots. In the presence of friends, neighbors and occasionally strangers, Iowa Democrats vote with their feet, by raising their hands and moving to different parts of the room to signify their support for one candidate or another. ? [F]or Democrats, it is not a one-person, one-vote system. ? Inducements are allowed; bribes are not." One has to love that last sentence.

The winner of the caucus will be the person who gets a tiny sliver of a tiny sliver of participants. And alas, most people reading this will hang on the media's coverage of the caucus anyway.

Full post as published by Election Updates on January 02, 2008 (boomark / email).