Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Criminal Appeal

Criminal Law

: Criminal Appeal

Cal. Supreme Court Vacates Death Sentence On Faretta Grounds

By Jeremy Price

In between the guilt and penalty phases of a capital murder trial, the defendant brought a Faretta motion to represent himself at the penalty phase. Although the trial court had found the defendant competent to stand trial, it denied appellant's Faretta motion based on a finding of mental incapacity to represent himself. The United States Supreme Court, however, has held that the test for competency to stand trial is the same as the test for competency to represent oneself. Thus, if the defendant was competent to stand trial, as the court found him to be, then he was also competent to represent himself, irrespective of any perceived mental deficiencies. Therefore, although the Court affirmed the jury's guilt finding, it reversed the death sentence...continue to full post

Full post as published by Criminal Appeal on December 18, 2007 (boomark / email).