
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
Criminal Appeal 

Post-conviction practice in the Ninth Circuit and the California state courts.
Post Frequency: 0.1/day Last Entry: January 09, 2010 at 02:53:12 Recent Entries: 35
Go to Criminal Appeal, find other Criminal Law blogs, or browse all law blogs.
Search
Posts
Can Juvenile Priors be Used As Strikes? - Response Requested by SCOTUS
Posted on January 09, 2010Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the State of California to file a response to the certiorari petition filed by the defendant in Nguyen v. Cal., no. 09-604. Nguyen presents the question of whether a prior juvenile adjudication obtained in...
Dear Court Reporters (or should I say, "DEAR COURT REPORTERS")
Posted on December 30, 2008Dear Court Reporters, Having finished reading another all-capitalized reporter's transcript it's time to again implore you to remember that the proper use of capitalization is not simply a matter of style, but it is more a convention designed to assist...
AG Promulgates AEDPA Opt-In Regs
Posted on December 10, 2008The U.S. Attorney General has promulgated regulations governing opt-in procedures for states seeking fast-track consideration of capital federal habeas cases under AEDPA. As reported by the CJLF, the determinations of whether states qualified for fast track proceedings used to be...
Ninth Circuit Takes First Step Toward Electronic Filing
Posted on January 31, 2008Last week, the Ninth Circuit announced that it is beginning implementation of an electronic case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). For now, counsel and parties can elect to receive email notification of docket activity. According to the announcement,...
2254(d) "Contrary To" Prong Explicated
Posted on January 31, 2008Last week, in Frantz v. Hazey, no. 05-16024 (9th Cir., Jan. 22, 2008) an en banc Ninth Circuit panel clarified how a federal habeas court is to proceed when it finds that a state court decision is contrary to US...
Denial of Motion to Withdraw Faretta Waiver Structural Error
Posted on January 09, 2008In a serious drug prosecution, the defendant asserted his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself pursuant to Faretta v. California (1975) 422 U.S. 806. During jury selection he changed his mind and asked the trial court to appoint counsel on...
At NGI Extended Commitment Trials Jurors Must Be Instructed On The Issue Of Whether The Person Has Serious Difficulty Controlling Dangerous Behavior
Posted on January 09, 2008In In re Howard N. (2005) 35 Cal.4th 117, the California Supreme Court held that in order to comport with federal due process principles the extended commitment scheme for minor wards (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 1800, et seq.) must...
Words May Constitute Sufficient Provocation To Reduce Murder To Manslaughter
Posted on January 09, 2008In a murder prosecution, the trial court instructed the jury pursuant to CALCRIM no. 917 that mere words cannot establish a defense to battery. In addition, the court allowed the prosecutor to argue to the jury that words cannot legally...
SVP Recommitments and Indeterminate Terms, Take 2
Posted on January 09, 2008As noted in a previous post, two California appellate courts recently concluded that individuals subject to two-year sexually violent predator (SVP) civil commitments at the time the electorate passed Prop 83 can face the prospect of indeterminate terms upon expiration...
Traffic Stops and Temporary Operating Permits
Posted on January 09, 2008A police officer initiated a traffic stop because the vehicle he observed had expired registration tags on its license plates. The officer subsequently discovered drugs in the vehicle and arrested the driver. The driver then brought a Fourth Amendment suppression...
Introduction Of Deceased Victim's Hearsay Statement Merits Reversal Of Manslaughter Conviction
Posted on December 18, 2007California Evidence Code section 1370 creates an exception to the hearsay rule that permits the introduction of an unavailable witness' statement to a medical professional "made at or near the time of the infliction or threat of physical injury." In....
Did Prop 83 Eliminate The SVP Extended Commitment Scheme?
Posted on December 18, 2007In November 2006, the voters enacted Prop 83, which substantially amended the state's sexually violent predator (SVP) civil commitment law, which had also recently been amended by the Legislature in September 2006. Under the old law, commitments were two years...
Cal. Supreme Court Vacates Death Sentence On Faretta Grounds
Posted on December 18, 2007In between the guilt and penalty phases of a capital murder trial, the defendant brought a Faretta motion to represent himself at the penalty phase. Although the trial court had found the defendant competent to stand trial, it denied appellant's...
Possession Of Cocaine Base For Sale Not Necessarily Lesser Included Offense Of Selling Cocaine Base
Posted on December 18, 2007The defendant in this case was convicted for both selling cocaine base in one count and possessing that same rock for sale in a second count. A panel of the Third District Court of Appeal held that the possession for...
Are Juvenile Adjudications Prior Convictions Under Apprendi and Blakely? Take 2.
Posted on December 18, 2007On June 29, 2007, in People v. Nguyen (H028798), a two-justice majority of a panel from the Sixth District Court of Appeal concluded that "the use of a juvenile adjudication to enhance the defendant?s sentence beyond the ordinary, statutorily-mandated maximum...
Cal. Supreme Court Splits On Admissibility Of "Eulogy" Video At Capital Sentencing Hearing
Posted on December 17, 2007During the penalty phase of the defendant's capital trial, the court permitted the prosecution to show the jury a videotape prepared by the victim's mother portraying the victim's life. The trial court concluded, under Evidence Code section 352, that the...
Sealed Juvenile Records May Not Be Unsealed For Use In SVP Proceedings
Posted on December 17, 2007The Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) petitioned the juvenile court to disclose an adult prisoner's juvenile records that had been sealed pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 781 (Section 781). BPH intended to use the sealed records to evaluate...
Hospitals Can Be Prisons Too
Posted on December 17, 2007Pursuant to a California statute that provides for the transfer of mentally ill prisoners to state hospitals, the defendant in this case was transported from a state prison to Atascadero State Hospital. Shortly after his arrival at the hospital, he...
California Trial Courts Have The Discretion To Strike Certain Deadly Weapons Enhancements
Posted on December 17, 2007After a jury convicted the defendant in this case of robbery and assault charges and found true a special allegation that the defendant personally used a deadly or dangerous weapon in violation of California Penal Code (PC) section 12022(b)(1), the...
Petty Theft With A Prior Is A Lesser Included Offense Of Robbery
Posted on December 17, 2007A jury convicted a criminal defendant of one count of second degree robbery in violation of California Penal Code (PC) section 211 and one count of petty theft with a prior theft-related conviction in violation of PC section 666. Both...
Late-Filed Civil Commitment Petition Requires Dismissal
Posted on August 14, 2007California Penal Code section 2960 et seq. provides for the civil commitment of certain mentally disordered offenders (MDOs) during and after their parole period. The MDO Act contains a number of statutorily created deadlines that govern the original commitment and...
Two Cal. Supreme Court Rulings Blunt Impact Of Cunningham
Posted on July 31, 2007In a pair of unanimous opinions authored by Chief Justice George, the California Supreme Court dealt a major blow to criminal defendants in California hoping to gain reduced sentences by virtue of the U.S. Supreme Court's Cunningham decision. In People...
Cal. Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence Over Kennard's Dissent
Posted on July 31, 2007The California Supreme Court affirmed the conviction and death sentence of a man found to have murdered and dismembered a woman in order to prevent her from testifying against him in another case. While Justice Kennard concurred in the portion...
Cal. Supreme Court Overturns Death Sentence
Posted on July 31, 2007In a rare capital habeas victory, the California Supreme Court unanimously reversed a jury's death sentence and ordered a new penalty hearing based on new evidence that a third party actually committed the murders in question. According to the Court,...
Firearm Sentence Enhancements Not Subject To Prohibition Against Multiple Punishment
Posted on July 31, 2007Accoridng to California Penal Code section 654 (PC 654), an act that is made punishable in different ways by different provisions of the Penal Code may be punished under either provision but not both. The ban on multiple punishment applies...
Life Sentence for 0.03 grams of Meth
Posted on July 13, 2007Yesterday, Marin Superior Court Judge Stephen Graham imposed a 25-to-life sentence for simple possession of 0.03 grams of methamphetamine under California?s Three Strikes law. (People v. Foroutan, No. 114626A.) The defendant has never committed a crime of violence and his...
Retroactive Application of New Rule of Evidence Does Not Violate Ex Post Facto Clause
Posted on July 03, 2007The Ninth Circuit held today that retroactive application of California Evidence Code Sec. 1108, which permits introduction of evidence prior sexual misconduct, does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause. (Schroeder v. Tilton, No. 06-15391 (Wallace, Chudahy, McKeown)) A California...
Another Unusual Habeas Decision from the Ninth Circuit
Posted on May 31, 2007In a per curiam opinion, the court affirmed a grant of habeas to a California prisoner convicted of murder in 1992. (Pulido v. Chrones, No. 05-15916 (Goodwin, O?Scannlain, Thomas)) The issue is the standard of harmless error review applied to...
Conflict of Interest Claims Do Not Apply to Appellate Counsel
Posted on May 23, 2007The Ninth Circuit held that, under federal habeas review, conflict of interest claims do not apply to appellate counsel. Foote v. Del Papa, No. 06-15094 (Wallace, Thomas, Ezra). The court reasoned that there is no ?clearly established? law on the...
New and Improved Execution Protocol
Posted on May 16, 2007From today's L.A. Times: "Seeking to end judge's ban on executions, officials propose 'pain-free' method." Click here for the story.
Next
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.









