Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> ZeroPaid
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Copyright Law
: ZeroPaidRapidShare Fined $33 million for Violating German Copyright Laws
By soulxtc
Court rules site, and others like it, are responsible for ensuring copyrighted material isn’t illegally hosted on their servers.
The Hamburg Regional Court of Germany has ruled against German-owned file hosting website RapidShare this past Tuesday. It found the site guilty of violation of German copyright law and set damages at about ?24 million ($33.4 million).
In what could prove a key precedent, the court found Rapidshare, and by extension similar file-sharing sites, bear principle responsibility for ensuring copyright-protected material is not illegally posted on their servers.
The ruling was a major victory for German royalty collection agency GEMA, which had brought the suit against Rapidshare for allowing some 5,000 protected music titles to be posted on their site.
“The judgment states that the hosting service itself is now responsible for making sure that none of the music tracks concerned are distributed via its platform in the future,” said GEMA in a press release. “This means that the copyright holder is no longer required to perform the ongoing and complex checks.”
“The judgment of the Regional Court of Hamburg marks a milestone in GEMA’s efforts to combat the illegal use of music works on the Internet,” said Dr. Harald Heker, CEO of GEMA, in a statement. “GEMA will continue to do everything it can to shield its members from online piracy. We are confident that in this way we will be able to reduce the illegal use of the GEMA repertoire on the Internet to a negligible level.”
Bobby Chang, COO of RapidShare AG, played down the significance of the verdict.
“We do not consider the court’s decision to be a breakthrough,” he said afterwards. “As other proceedings in similar disputes with GEMA have shown, there is considerable disparity amongst the individual courts in some cases.”
“Our experience is that the courts of appeal tend to restrict the scope of the decisions made by the lower courts. For this reason, we think that it would make more sense to work together to provide music fans with the right services at the right price and to open up a new source of income for music-markets on the Internet.”
RapidShare’s been under assault by copyright holders for a while now, it’s most recent attacker being German book publishers who wanted the site placed on the ISP’s blacklist of blocked sites.
Stay tuned.
jared@zeropaid.com
Full post as published by ZeroPaid on June 25, 2009 (boomark / email).
Dumb New York Laws
Stupid Laws in the Empire State
Dumb Texas Laws
Stupid Laws in the Lone Star State
Dumb California Laws
Stupid Laws in the Sunshine State
Dumb Foreign Laws
Stupid Laws of Other Countries
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Damaged Billboards
Lamar Advertising pays $35,000 settlement after violating permit laws.
School Misrepresentation
Lehigh Valley College agrees to pay $200,000 settlement for violating consumer protection laws.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
California Labor Laws
alleged violations of California labor laws such as overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
California Hospitals
Fined for Shoddy Care

German file-sharing site fined 24m euros
Copyright Police Crash Spanish Wedding
Rapidshare zu Recht als Mitstörer verurteilt
Warum die Gema gegen RapidShare klagt









