Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Blog of Rights
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Constitutional Law
: Blog of RightsCoalition Files Lawsuit Against Arizona's Racial Profiling Law
By Suzanne Ito, ACLU
Arizona upended the basic tenets of a free society when its governor signed S.B. 1070, a law that requires police officers in that state to demand papers proving the citizenship or immigration status of people they stop if the officer has some undefined "reasonable suspicion" that they are not in this country legally. Under S.B. 1070, law enforcement will be forced to rely on people's appearance, victimizing citizens and noncitizens alike.
Today, the ACLU, the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund, the National Immigration Law Center, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, ACLU of Arizona, National Day Laborer Organizing Network and the Asian Pacific American Legal Center (a member of the Asian American Center for Advancing Justice) filed a federal lawsuit against the state's sheriffs and county attorneys, asking the court to find S.B. 1070 unconstitutional. It violates the 14th Amendment's guarantee of equal protection under the law because it unlawfully invites the racial profiling of Latinos and other people who look or sound "foreign-born." It also violates the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution by interfering with the federal government's authority to regulate and enforce immigration. Our lawsuit is on behalf of a diverse coalition of Arizona residents and organizations including the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the Southside Presbyterian Church, the Asian Chamber of Commerce of Arizona, and the Muslim American Society.
In this video, Alessandra Soler Meetze, Executive Director of the ACLU of Arizona, explains why we're challenging the law, and the impact the law has already had on Arizona residents:
|
Please note that by playing this clip You Tube and Google will place a long-term cookie on your computer. Please see You Tube's privacy statement on their website and Google's privacy statement on theirs to learn more. To view the ACLU's privacy statement, click here.
|
It is practically impossible to think of any legitimate way police could develop a suspicion that someone is here unlawfully without racial profiling. Under this law, people who look "foreign" are more likely to be stopped for minor infractions like having a broken taillight, jaywalking or having an overgrown lawn — and then asked for their papers if police believe, just by looking at them, that they could be in the country unlawfully. That means that U.S. citizens and noncitizens alike will be required to carry papers on them at all times.
S.B. 1070 would essentially turn Arizona into a police state, where merely looking "foreign" authorizes the police to treat you as potential criminal suspect. Which is why many top law enforcement officials oppose this law. Time reports:
Chief John Harris of Sahuarita, the current president of the Arizona Association of Chiefs of Police, said he opposed the law before Governor Jan Brewer signed it and still does today. He listed his objections: Immigration has traditionally been a federal issue, and the police already have "manpower and budget issues" that will only get worse under the law. "[…] He's also concerned that victims may not report crimes to his officers.
Already, state governments across the country are considering laws similar to Arizona's. It's our hope that the lawsuit filed today will show that such laws will not pass constitutional muster in court, and passing more laws like it will be futile. S.B. 1070 is un-American and undermines our values of fairness and equality for all people. Stand with us, and show that what happens in Arizona stops in Arizona.
Full post as published by Blog of Rights on May 17, 2010 (boomark / email).
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Vioxx Lawsuits
Vioxx personal injury suits are a seroius concern for Merck and patietns
Construction Site Accidents
Lawsuits related to accidents
Bextra Injury Risks
Bextra Increases Risk of Fatal Heart Attack
Microsoft
Settles with Arizona for $4.4 Million
Lehman Brothers
Bankrupt, Files Chapter 11
Nevada Onion
Workers Injured, EPA Files Complaint
Class Action Filed Over Incontinence Briefs
Arizona Health Care Faces Federal Class Action over Incontinence Briefs
Kamehameha Schools
$7 million non-native Hawaiian racial discrimination settlement.
Employee Discrimination
Vanguard Group Inc. agrees to $500,000 racial bias settlement.

Rights groups file suit against Arizona law
Holder Warns Arizona Law Could Create 'Slippery Slope' Toward Racial Profiling
RIGHTS GROUPS FILE CLASS ACTION CHALLENGING ARIZONA LAW
Sheriff Joe accused of racial profiling
Arizona's immigration law may spur a showdown
Cop accused of racial profiling teaches about racial profiling









