Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogFrischmann on "Patent Pull"
By Lawrence Solum
Brett M. Frischmann (Loyola University of Chicago - Law School) has posted The Pull of Patents (Fordham Law Review, Vol. 77, No. 5, p. 2143, 2008) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
This essay makes two related contributions. First, it introduces the concept of ?patent pull? to highlight an underexplored demand-side perspective on patents. Patents ?pull? (private and public) investment to productive activities that would be less attractive in the absence of patents. Exploring the role of patents from the demand side reveals that beyond affecting traditional capital investment decisions, patents can have more subtle and perhaps pervasive impacts on organizations and institutions, including but not limited to universities. This essay focuses on university science and technology research systems. Second, this essay examines how university science and technology research systems perform economically as infrastructural capital. Specifically, it explains that a university science and technology research system is an integrated system of productive resources aggregated within a university setting and used to produce streams of research-related outputs, as well as other important outputs, e.g., educated citizens. The system is comprised of at least five different sets of related, complementary resources, including 1.) Human capital, including complementary networks of people such as professors, researchers, students, administrators, technicians, and other support staff; 2.) Governance capital, such as rules, norms, policies and other collective constraints that guide system participants? behavior; 3.) Physical capital, such as land, facilities, and equipment, 4.) Intellectual capital, such as knowledge, information, and ideas; and 5.) Financial capital. Each of these capital resources is an essential component of the system. Although the bundle of such resources and manner in which they are bundled varies considerably across universities, all universities use these resources collectively and continuously to produce socially valuable human and intellectual capital. The essay raises some questions about the impacts of university patenting and commercialization on university science and technology research systems. It considers how the demand pull exerted in downstream commercial markets may affect the allocation of infrastructural capital. The examination is preliminary and intended to support further exploration and empirical study. While there have been plenty of empirical studies of university patenting behavior and the performance of technology transfer offices, there has been less attention paid to the allocation of infrastructural capital. The essay suggests a few avenues for further research.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on August 06, 2009 (boomark / email).
Pull Vicodin, Percocet
Expert Panel Advises FDA
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment

Frischmann on Carrier’s Innovation in the 21st Century
Demsetz on Frischmann and Toward a Theory of Property Rights
Hot Product or Flop Product The Golf Bag with a Built-In Pull Cart
The Patent Pal browser toolbar
Who is responsible for the patent backlog








