.

Google       

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402


Personal Injury Law

Toxics Defense Toxics Defense

Commentary, news and analysis of cases involving the defense of toxic torts claims.

Post Frequency: 0.1/day

Last Entry: August 19, 2010 at 23:02:04

Recent Entries: 17

Track this blog ()

Go to Toxics Defense, find other Personal Injury Law blogs, or browse all law blogs.

Search
This Blog Only All Blogs

Posts

The Law of Unintended Consequences: or, ?What do you mean you can?t tell me what the credits from prior settlements will be?? (Part 3)

Posted on August 19, 2010
In the last two posts, I talked about what Proposition 51 was, why it came to be, some of the unanticipated consequences, and how judgments are calculated, including the mechanics of allocation of pre-trial settlements to post-trial credits for the...


The Law of Unintended Consequences, or "What do you mean you can't tell me what the credits from prior settlements will be?" (Part 2)

Posted on August 16, 2010
As the prior post indicated, Proposition 51 (California Civil Code Section 1431.2) attempted to reduce lawsuits against defendant that represented ?deep pockets? by making liability for non-economic damages several, instead of joint, as had previously been the case...


The Law of Unintended Consequences: or, ?What do you mean you can?t tell me what the credits from prior settlements will be?? (Part 1)

Posted on August 10, 2010
In 1986, the People of the state of California were fed up, as is often the case. At that time, they were fed up with trial attorneys who sued big companies in personal injury actions just because they had ?deep...


Trial Court Orders Re-Trial of $208 million case

Posted on July 23, 2010
Bobby Evans worked for the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power for many years. Part of his work involved cutting asbestos-cement water pipe. On April 30th, a Los Angeles jury concluded that the dust he brought home on his...


To access this complete feed in the blog feed reader login or register for free.

Verdict Against Plant Insulation for Three Plaintiffs

Posted on January 30, 2009
In December, a jury found against Plant Insulation in a San Francisco trial that involved three different decedents. The families of James Harris, William Hearn and George Wetch were awarded verdicts totaling $4.3 million dollars. In truly bad news for...


Nanotubes - the new Asbestos?

Posted on May 20, 2008
I'm not going to try and describe what nanotubes are, aside from saying that they are very thin (1/50,000th the width of a human hair) man made [usually] carbon based tubes (fullerene "buckyballs" is another phrase that describes them, if...


California Adopts Sophisticated User Defense

Posted on April 03, 2008
In Johnson v. American Standard ( California Supreme Court Case No. S139184 (4/3/08)) the California Supreme Court found the perfect case in which to finally adopt the "sophisticated user defense", something that the U.S. District Court predicted would occur in...


LA Superior Court General Order Overturned

Posted on December 18, 2007
Los Angeles Superior Court has, for many years, had a General Order applicable in asbestos cases designed to avoid the need for defendants to bring full motions for summary judgment (and for the Court to analyze those motions and the...


$10.9 Million Asbestos Verdict

Posted on December 10, 2007
On December 7th, a jury in Los Angeles found in favor of Plaintiff Mr. Pelleys in the amount of $10.9 million, for injuries the jury found were caused, in part, by defendant John Crane company's asbestos-containing products. Defendant John Crane...


Silica Case Resolved

Posted on December 07, 2007
Plaintiff?s attorneys have been seeking to make Northern California the new seat of silica litigation since 2004. This week, the case that was scheduled to be the first to go to trial resolved as to all defendants. The ?mixed dust?...


California Complex Litigation Judge Censured

Posted on June 26, 2007
The following concerns Judge Freedman, who is the Complex Litigation Judge for Alameda Superior Court, supervising all of the asbestos and silica cases: (06-26) 12:34 PDT OAKLAND -- A state judicial agency censured an Alameda County judge today but allowed...


Another Defense Verdict in San Francisco

Posted on June 08, 2007
After two days of jury deliberation, counsel for Advocate Mines today handed the Brayton Purcell offices a defeat in a wrongful death mesothelioma case. The plaintiff, Mr. Shelton, who died at 87 years of age, was alleged by his counsel...


Tobacco Verdict Redux

Posted on May 11, 2007
Plaintiffs' attorney Madeline Chaber has now tried the same case on the same set of facts for the same plaintiff against the same defendant -- and gotten much the same verdict. On March 20, 2000, a San Francisco jury awarded...


Dr. Ray Harron's Texas License Not Renewed

Posted on April 19, 2007
Dr. Ray Harron first appeared on the national stage in 2005. Texas defense attorneys had noticed that many (if not most) of the 10,000 plaintiffs with silicosis cases pending in the M.D.L. had also filed claims alleging that they had...


SF Defense Verdict in Asbestos Case

Posted on April 18, 2007
A jury in San Francisco Superior court has granted a defense verdict for General Electric, and was unable to reach a decision as to the liability of Union Carbide Corporation in the case of Philip Rincon v. A.W. Chesterton, SFSC...


Punitive Damages Limited

Posted on February 22, 2007
The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a decision in Philip Morris USA v. Williams which appears to impose some limitations on punitive damage awards. In that case, a widow successfully sued, receiving a verdict for the death of her husband...


SV 40 Case Revived!

Posted on February 08, 2007
The California Court of Appeals today reversed a trial court's ruling that had dismissed a case in which the plaintiffs alleged that a case of mesothelioma was caused by SV 40. In Carol Asker, et al., v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,...


Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Bulletins

Related Law Articles

is===1
Related Law Questions
Related Searches
















US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!










is===1


1.2807 secs (new cache)