Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Eastern District of Texas Federal Court PracticeSMU symposium on Eastern District of Texas Patent Litigation
By Michael C. Smith
I will be speaking tomorrow morning, Friday, February 18, 2011 in Dallas on the opening panel at a symposium at SMU in Dallas The Eastern District of Texas and Patents, which is part of a series of seminar on emerging intellectual property issues at SMU's Dedman School of Law. According to the brochure, "[t]he Symposium will explore the history and development of the Eastern District of Texas (EDTX) as one of the Rocket-Docket jurisdictions for patent litigation. The Symposium will focus on the impact of the Eastern District of Texas on patent law, patent reform and innovation."
My panel is on Eastern District jurors, and is followed by a panel on war stories (at least I'm pretty sure that's what it'll end up being) then a lunch address on venue by Fifth Circuit judge Patrick Higginbotham. Interestingly, Judge Higginbotham was one of the three judges on the first Fifth Circuit panel in 2008 who voted to deny the petition for mandamus in In re Volkswagen. As readers know, that panel's decision was vacated and the case was reassigned to a different panel for rehearing, which granted the writ, whose decision was in turn vacated on petition for rehearing, and the petition was granted by the entire Fifth Circuit, sitting en banc. So it should be an interesting lunch.
After lunch, the history of the ED patent docket will be discussed by a panel including Chief Judge David Folsom, and district judges T. John Ward and Leonard Davis. Since these three judges, collectively, have heard well over a thousand patent cases over the past fifteen years, their comments ought to be interesting. The day winds up with a panel on the effect of district courts' patent cases on innovation.
The symnposium's organizer is SMU Dedman School of Law Professor Xuan-Thao Nguyen, who has written recently on the district's docket. If you're interested, you can register online at www.law.smu.edu.
Full post as published by Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice on February 17, 2011 (boomark / email).
Dumb Texas Laws
Stupid Laws in the Lone Star State
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Texas Employment Law
alleged violations of Texas labor laws including overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
Middle Eastern Discrimination
Cruise lines to pay $485,000 settlement in employment lawsuit.
$189 Million Settlement Reached in Slab Litigation
$189 Million Settlement Reached in Slab Litigation
Breakthrough Settlement Reached In Chinese Drywall Litigation
Chinese Drywall Litigation Breakthrough Settlement Reached

Report: District Courts With the Most Patent Filings 2009
U.S. District Court Judges Express Narrow View of Patent Claims
Welcome to Texas: Keep Your Powder Dry
Escaping East Texas's patent Roach Motel
In re Acer: Transfer Out of the Eastern District of Texas








