Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> IPBiz
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: IPBizNon-final re-exam Office Action rejects claims of BlackBoard's '138 patent
By Lawrence B. Ebert, Esq.
of the WARF patents, IPBiz adds some text. Keep in mind that an Office Action does NOT have the effect of invalidating claims.
There were two re-exams filed on BlackBoard's US 6,988,138: 90/008,330 and 95/000,199. On 17 March 2008, there was a decision merging the inter partes and ex parte proceedings. On 25 March 2008, a non-final Office Action was mailed to McDermott, Will and Emery in Washington, DC. The patentee gets 2 months to respond, and the third party requestor has 30 days from the date of the patentee's response to respond.
The examiner essentially adopted requestor's issue 10, an obviousness rejection over TopClass, and accepted with modification
issues 1-6.
For those interested in KSR issues, the examiner cited first to the CAFC's In re Kahn, and then to KSR. Of Kahn: Rejections on obviousness cannot be sustained by mere conclusory statements. In re Kahn, 441 F.3d 977, 988 (CAFC 2006).
One recalls that the ill-fated re-examination effort of PubPat and FTCR (now re-named "Consumer Watchdog") on the WARF patents fell apart on the conclusory nature of statements by Loring and Trounson. The statements contained no articulated reasoning with rational underpinning. The examiner in the BlackBoard matter also cited KSR on the "combination of familiar elements." 127 S. Ct. at 1749. The examiner cited LeapFrog on old idea with new technology, tho that was of course the
point of KSR itself. [See LeapFrog, 485 F.3d 1157, 1162]
See also
http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/02/blackboard-wins-over-desire2learn-in-ed.html
http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2006/12/re-exam-request-on-blackboards-138.html
Full post as published by IPBiz on March 30, 2008 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Final Fantasy XI
Square Enix Faces Class Action over Deceptive Fees and Payments
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
OfficeMax Recalls Office Chairs Due to Fall Hazard
OfficeMax Recalls Office Chairs Due to Fall Hazard
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.

New Law #1: A setback at the Patent Office for BlackBoard
USPTO Rejects Blackboard's E-Learning Patents
U.S. Patent Office Rejects All Ninety-Five NeoMedia Patent Claims
PTOs Non-Final Rejections Could Have Permanent Implications for the BlackBerry Lawsuit
Blackboard expands outreach to Facebook








