Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Constitutionally CorrectWV district court upholds Stolen Valor Act against First Amendment challenge
By Alliance Alert
Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on January 06, 2011 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.
Lifeblood
alleging negligence after computers were stolen which contained personal information.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
FFDA Issues Warning about Stolen Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Solution and Ipratropium Bromide Inhalation Solution
Albuterol, Ipratropium FDA Warns Consumers not to Use
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.

District Court Upholds Stolen Valor Act Again First Amendment Challenge
Prosecution Over ‘Stolen Valor’ Faces First Amendment Challenge
Semper Fraud: Two False Heroes Challenge The Constitutionality of The Stolen Valor Act
Federal Court Dismisses Prosecution Under Stolen Valor Act
Stolen Valor Act Unconstitutional: Ninth Circuit's Opinion in Alvarez








