ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Slaw.ca

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Research

: Slaw.ca

Deeper free online coverage of Supreme Court of Canada Decisions

By Ted Tjaden

ADVERTISEMENTS

As has been discussed multiple times on SLAW and based on two emails over the past few days, it appears the first phase of adding of older Supreme Court of Canada decisions to the court’s website has been completed. This is great news. I like the fact that the PDFs are of the actual Supreme Court Reports version (i.e., a PDF of the print version). See, for example:

Trust and Loan Co. v. Ruttan (1877), 1 S.C.R. 564
PDF file (40 pages): http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1877/0rcs1-564/0rcs1-564.pdf

The message from colleague Rosalie Fox (Director of the SCC Library) to the CALL listserv was as follows:

The Supreme Court of Canada, in cooperation with LexUM - Université de Montréal, is pleased to announce major additions to the content of the Supreme Court of Canada Judgments website. We have added to the database some 2,500 judgments that the Court delivered between 1876 and 1985, including hundreds of the most cited decisions and all decisions that originated in Ontario.

The Court wants to thank the Law Foundation of Ontario, which financed the digitalization project required to make these decisions freely accessible to the public. The Canadian Legal Information Institute (CanLII) also made available hundreds of frequently cited historical decisions that were not freely available until now.

We anticipate further enhancements to the website over the next few months.

Bravo and well done!

[Additional comment: the citation on the foregoing case was edited by me - the original did not have the year in the correct place and used “vs.” instead of “v.” - I assume this can be corrected on the site - see: http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1877/0rcs1-564/0rcs1-564.html]

[Correction by me - the “citation” is more correct than I have indicated (in the green shaded part at the top, although one of the commas is wrong). The citation below that - in the white part - uses “vs.” which I assume perhaps comes from the (old) decision itself . . . .]

Full post as published by Slaw.ca on March 28, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0156 secs (new cache)