Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Slaw.ca
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Research
: Slaw.caDeeper free online coverage of Supreme Court of Canada Decisions
By Ted Tjaden
As has been discussed multiple times on SLAW and based on two emails over the past few days, it appears the first phase of adding of older Supreme Court of Canada decisions to the court’s website has been completed. This is great news. I like the fact that the PDFs are of the actual Supreme Court Reports version (i.e., a PDF of the print version). See, for example:
Trust and Loan Co. v. Ruttan (1877), 1 S.C.R. 564
PDF file (40 pages): http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1877/0rcs1-564/0rcs1-564.pdf
The message from colleague Rosalie Fox (Director of the SCC Library) to the CALL listserv was as follows:
The Supreme Court of Canada, in cooperation with LexUM - Université de Montréal, is pleased to announce major additions to the content of the Supreme Court of Canada Judgments website. We have added to the database some 2,500 judgments that the Court delivered between 1876 and 1985, including hundreds of the most cited decisions and all decisions that originated in Ontario.
The Court wants to thank the Law Foundation of Ontario, which financed the digitalization project required to make these decisions freely accessible to the public. The Canadian Legal Information Institute (CanLII) also made available hundreds of frequently cited historical decisions that were not freely available until now.
We anticipate further enhancements to the website over the next few months.
Bravo and well done!
[Additional comment: the citation on the foregoing case was edited by me - the original did not have the year in the correct place and used “vs.” instead of “v.” - I assume this can be corrected on the site - see: http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1877/0rcs1-564/0rcs1-564.html]
[Correction by me - the “citation” is more correct than I have indicated (in the green shaded part at the top, although one of the commas is wrong). The citation below that - in the white part - uses “vs.” which I assume perhaps comes from the (old) decision itself . . . .]
Full post as published by Slaw.ca on March 28, 2008 (boomark / email).
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Wind and Hail Coverage
Allstate Corp. agrees to restore insurance coverage and pay $250,000 settlement.
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
Online Ticket Vendor
Buying Tickets Online That Never Arrive
Health Insurers
Dictating Medical Decisions
Florida Medicaid
Limiting Coverage of Drugs for Kids
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million

Supreme Court of Canada Defends Fair Comment and Free Speech
Free Courts of Appeals decisions from 1950 and all US Supreme Court decisions since 1754 Coming Soon
The Womens Court of Canada: Native Womens Association of Canada v. Canada
Wal-Mart Cases Will be Heard by the SCC
Free Online Access to U.S. Court Decisions








