Academic

J.P. FREIRE: ?Violent,? ?angry,? ?fear-mongering? Tea Party narrative debunked in one n?

By Glenn Reynolds

J.P. FREIRE: ?Violent,? ?angry,? ?fear-mongering? Tea Party narrative debunked in one night.

Allegedly, the Tea Party movement has been violent, angry, intent to incite fear and hate among the populace. These narratives weren?t true ? tonight?s vote has proven them caricatures laid out by journalists with short wordcounts and shorter attention spans.

Violent movements do not do these things. They don?t show up at the polls and overwhelm the establishment in favor of a minority candidate, as in the case of Sen.-elect Marco Rubio, R-Fla. They also don?t lose so badly, as in the case of Christine O?Donnell. They don?t take on, and nearly defeat, the leader of the majority party in the Senate, at the same time as he colludes with casinos in a potentially illegal scheme to get out the vote in his favor. They don?t settle for a more liberal candidate in Illinois just because he?s the most electable.

Yet they did all of those things. Strange.

Yep. Another failed narrative.

Full post as published by Instapundit.com on November 03, 2010 (boomark / email).