Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Dallas Personal Injury Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Dallas Personal Injury LawyerColorado vs. New Zealand - Medical Malpractice Liability
By RLF Staff
An interesting column by Senator Bob Hagedorn in the Rocky Mountain News looks at what he considers limitations and shortcomings of the medical malpractice systems in the state, as well as the nation, and compares those systems to one in place in New Zealand.
Some of his outlined shortfalls in what he refers to as a lawsuit-based status quo include: Physicians are poorly policed with little prevention of future errors; Large sums of money are wasted - and are not used to meet medical needs of uninsured families; the conflict created undermines the doctor-patient relationship; and access to health care is further restricted as doctors avoid higher risk practices like baby delivery (or are opting for 'easier' methods in such practices). One example he shared was that, "obstetricians are increasingly performing Caesarean sections to avoid being blamed for an infant's cerebral palsy. And, in fact, the incidence of Caesarean sections has grown from 5 percent to more then 30 percent of all births since the 1970s. Caesarean sections are far more expensive and more dangerous for most women than natural birth. Children with cerebral palsy often have extraordinary needs that cost their families huge amounts of money and time. These needs must be met regardless of the cause. "
His suggestion: Follow New Zealand's example. He said that the country successfully compensates patients while ensuring the accountability among physicials by providing compensation to injured patients regardless of fault. This is a separate process from the one in place to identify medical errors and improve quality of care. The accountability system includes various disciplinary actions but emphasizes learning from mistakes and improving the system to prevent repeated problems.
What do you think? Should the systems be separate? Should all injured patients be compensated before cause is considered? Should doctors be held more accountable by legal recourse and uncaped awards or simply be subject to "disciplinary action" as done in New Zealand. Please leave a comment. If you would like to know more about your current legal options when it comes to medical malpractice and/or birth injury, contact a medical malpractice attorney today.
Full post as published by Dallas Personal Injury Lawyer on March 24, 2008 (boomark / email).
National Practitioner Data Bank Fact
NPDB identifies unprofessional healthcare practitioners
Gallbladder Surgery Errors Damage Bile Duct
X-ray Procedures Can Reduce Gall Bladder Surgery Error Rates
Military Veterans Benefits
How to obtain full range of benefits for veterans and dependnets
Military Veterans Benefits, Part 2
Training, Healthcare, and Death Benefits
Medical Malpractice
medical malpractice lawsuit.
Birthing Malpractice
Kaiser Permanente pays $3.2 million medical malpractice settlement.
Intentional Contamination
Northwestern Medical Center pays former orthopedic surgery $4 million medical malpractice settlement.
Medical Malpractice Suit Settled for $1.69 Million
Medical Malpractice Suit Settled for $1.69 Million
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award
King Medical Malpractice
Five More Suits Settled for $3 Million

Looking beyond the borders: is New Zealands approach to medical liability working
Medical Malpractice: When you don't Get what you Pay for
What Medical Malpractice Crisis
Medical Malpractice: Actors, Flaws, and Reform (II)
Ohio University Named in Malpractice Suit








