ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Through investigation of allegations of misconduct prior to initiating disciplinary action critical

ADVERTISEMENTS
Through investigation of allegations of misconduct prior to initiating disciplinary action critical
Michaelis v State, New York State Supreme Court, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports, affd., 258 A.D.2d 693]

The Michaelis case illustrates the importance of an employer thoroughly investigating allegations before serving disciplinary charges against an employee.

A jury awarded back salary and damages to Kenneth Michaelis for ?emotional suffering? because it decided that the employer had not ?thoroughly investigated? before disciplining him.

Michaelis was one of two white deputy superintendents employed at a New York State Department of Corrections facility who were demoted for allegedly subjecting an African-American deputy superintendent to ?ridicule or racially insensitive comments.?

Michaelis was charged with placing a ?jail bird? figure on the door of an African-American co-worker Frank Irvin. Irvin viewed Michaelis? action ?racist? and submitted a complaint to the Department.

The Appellate Division had allowed Michaelis? lawsuit against the New York State Department of Correctional Services to heard by a jury when it sustained a lower court?s refusal to dismiss his complaint [see 244 A.D.2d 636]. Michaelis? suit alleged that the Department had imposed a more severe disciplinary penalty on him than it had on others who committed similar acts or omissions.

Michaels contended this harsher treatment was because of his race, and that this violated the State?s Human Rights Law. He maintained that he had been subjected to ?reverse discrimination? when he was disciplined because of what he contended was ?harmless prank.?

The jury decided that Michaelis had been disciplined by the Department without it first having ?thoroughly investigated allegations of racism? directed against him. The award: $238,000 as back wages plus $90,000 for ?emotional suffering? was sustained by the Appellate Division.

============================================
If you are interested in learning more about disciplinary procedures involving public officers and employees, please click here: http://thedisciplinebook.blogspot.com/
============================================
.

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on September 13, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0202 secs (new cache)