ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Drug Injury Watch

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Drug Injury Watch

Will The FDA Follow The EMA And Order A Meridia Recall After Its September 2010 Advisory Committee Meeting

By Tom Lamb

ADVERTISEMENTS

NEJM Editorial: There Should Be A Meridia Recall As The Risk Of Heart-Related Side Effects Is Greater Than Any Weight-Loss Benefit

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

According to a recent medical article, "Effect of Sibutramine on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Overweight and Obese Subjects" (Abstract), published September 2, 2010 by the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), patients with preexisting cardiovascular conditions who were given the obesity drug Meridia (sibutramine) over a long term had an increased risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or heart attack, and nonfatal stroke, but not an increased risk of cardiovascular death or of all-cause mortality. 

These new findings came from the full results of "A Long-Term Study of Sibutramine and the Role of Obesity Management in Relation to Cardiovascular Disease in Overweight and Obese Patients" -- which is commonly referred to as the Sibutramine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (SCOUT).  The September 2010 NEJM article referenced above was authored by the SCOUT investigators.

Previously, the preliminary results from the SCOUT trial were first released by the FDA in their "Early Communication about an Ongoing Safety Review of Meridia (sibutramine hydrochloride)", issued back in November 2009.  That Early Communication was intended to let patients and their doctors know about a possible increased risk for adverse cardiovascular events associated with the obesity drug Meridia.

On September 15, 2010 an FDA Advisory Committee will meet to discuss the full results of this Sibutramine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (SCOUT).

As background, in January 2010 -- after having considered the preliminary results from the SCOUT trial -- the European Medicines Agency (EMA) advised doctors and pharmacists to stop prescribing and dispensing European equivalents of Meridia.

At about the same time the FDA, after looking at the same SCOUT study data, took a less forceful step and simply asked Abbott Laboratories, the maker of Meridia, to put a stronger warning on its label.

In more detail, in January 2010 the FDA issued its "Follow-Up to the November 2009 Early Communication about an Ongoing Safety Review of Sibutramine, Marketed as Meridia".

In relevant part, this January 2010 FDA document called for a stronger warning on the Meridia package insert, or label, which had warned against the use of Meridia by patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD).  With the revision requested by the FDA, that CVD warning would become a "contraindication", i.e., a higher level of warning, and would state that Meridia should not be used in patients with histories of:

  • coronary artery disease, including MI and angina
  • congestive heart failure
  • arrhythmia
  • stroke or transient ischemic attack
  • peripheral arterial disease
  • uncontrolled hypertension

Notably, the September 2, 2010 edition of the NEJM also had an accompanying Meridia editorial, "Sibutramine ? Another Flawed Diet Pill" (first 100 words; subscription required for full text), by Dr. Gregory D. Curfman and colleagues, which disagreed with the conclusion reached by the SCOUT investigators, namely that no changes are needed as regards the current clinical use of Meridia, i.e., limited to patients without preexisting cardiovascular disease (CVD).

In that September 2010 NEJM editorial Dr. Curfman and his colleagues write:

The investigators' conclusion is based on a narrow interpretation of the SCOUT data, in which only the patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease had an increase in the risk of new cardiovascular events....

We surely need safe and effective medications to help overweight and obese patients lose weight and improve their long-term health. But given that sibutramine has minimal efficacy for weight loss, no apparent benefit for clinical outcomes, a worrisome cardiovascular risk profile, and a plausible mechanism to explain the cardiovascular risk, it is difficult to discern a credible rationale for keeping this medication on the market.

So will the FDA follow the EMA, now, and order a Meridia recall sometime after this September 15, 2010 Advisory Committee meeting, or not?  Be assured we will be watching for this outcome and report it here.

______________________________________________________________________________

DrugInjuryLaw.com: Legal Information And News About Prescription Drug Side Effects

Full post as published by Drug Injury Watch on September 10, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0206 secs (new cache)