ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Canadian Immigration Blawg

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Canadian Immigration Blawg

Psychological considerations on the concept of atrocity and the compelling reasons exception

By Sharma Harsanyi Barristers & Solicitors

ADVERTISEMENTS

I am working on a paper with Dr. Hap Davis IV on the psychological considerations on the concept of atrocity and the compelling reasons exception contained in the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. 

A ?Compelling Reason? is an exception under Canada?s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. It provides an avenue to a refugee to be protected even if changes in the socio-political landscape of the country of origin makes it no longer possible for the individual to say that removal from Canada would subject him or her to danger of torture, cruel or unusual treatment or punishment, or a risk to life. 

Through jurisprudence the Federal Court in Canada indicates that if a person has suffered ?appalling? or ?atrocious? treatment, then this person may apply for the compelling reasons exception to the Act even if a return would otherwise be deemed safe.  However, beyond the provision of synonymous and subjective terms such as "appalling" or "atrocious" the Court has not provided sufficient direction to the Refugee Protection Division.

We hope to provide a review of of empirical psychological literature by which mental disorder and loss of instrumental, social, emotional and cognitive functioning in a claimant may be used to describe the context and scope of an individual suffering from extreme and disproportionate hardship.

If society sets the terms for what acts may be deemed appalling then psychology can help establish whether the atrocity can be elevated to a compelling reason sufficient to grant protection. Prevalence and severity of disorder may be used to give dimension to the term ?compelling?.

Finally, the utility of psychological science should be underscored to both practitioners and adjudicators that are charged with administering internationally accepted human rights codes for protection of persecuted persons.

 

Full post as published by Canadian Immigration Blawg on September 04, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0133 secs (new cache)