Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Phosita
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: PhositaTaco John’s Claims Rights in Taco Tuesday
By Douglas J. Sorocco, J. Matthew Buchanan, Laura C. Woods and Emily E. Campbell.
The ?Taco Tuesday? battle exploded on Twitter, blogs, NewsOK, Fox 25 News, and even Facebook. Taco John?s owns U.S. Trademark Registration No. 1,572,589 for the mark TACO TUESDAY (seen below). It appears that Taco John?s attorneys sent the Oklahoma City based Iguana Mexican Grill a letter notifying Iguana of Taco John?s alleged rights and registration. Taco John?s also ordered Iguana to cease and desist usage of the hashtag #tacotuesday.

What started as an attempt by Taco John?s to assert its trademark rights, resulted in some fantastic PR for Iguana Grill. For those of you that are not from Oklahoma, you should know that as Oklahomans, we stick together. Iguana Grill has generously invested time and money into the community through volunteerism and food donations. The Oklahoma City community is extremely loyal to Iguana and when everyone caught wind of Taco John?s requests, a frenzy of tweets ensued. The community rallied around Iguana by voicing their support for the usage of ?Taco Tuesday? on Twitter and Facebook. Fans also showed their support by gathering at Iguana. Iguana sold a record number of tacos on Tuesday ? approximately 2,000 tacos.
Tuesday?s tweets included things like:
- ?petition @tacojohns to stop copyright enforcement of #tacotuesday hashtag?
- ?#tacotuesday is used all over CA! But qdoba uses #tacomonday. Who want #tacowednesday…Patent pending?
- ?Potential new @iguanaokc promotion: @TacoJohns Sucks Tuesday #tacotuesday (They don’t have a patent on that one.)?
- ?So does anyone know if ThirstyThursday has a copyright? If so, Who will hold a big party to celebrate the end? #tacotuesday?
- ?Their trademark can’t keep the customers from calling it #TacoTuesday?
@TacoJohns even tweeted:
?Taco John?s holds the copyright to Taco Tuesday giving us the exclusive right to use and protect it.?
(Emphasis Added.)
So which one is it? What exactly is Taco John?s trying to assert? A patent? A copyright? A trademark? It seems that even @TacoJohns needs some guidance as to the differences between copyrights and trademarks. Taco John?s claim is centered around its alleged trademark, not copyright, for the phrase ?Taco Tuesday.?
Generally speaking, patents protect inventions, copyrights protect creative works of authorship like music, photos, videos, and literary works, and trademarks protect brands. Taco John?s is alleging that Taco Tuesday is their brand name, that they have trademark rights in it, and that Iguana cannot use it without their permission. Are there legal arguments that could be made in response to Taco John?s? Sure. Does it matter that several other companies use the phrase ?Taco Tuesday?? Possibly. But that is another post for another day.
For more information on the difference between patents, trademarks, and copyrights check out this PHOSITA blog post posted earlier last year.
Related posts:
- IgniteOKC – Leadership Committee Meeting Want to be a part of something cool in Oklahoma...
- Scrabble v. Scrabulous ...
- All Business Have Intellectual Property ...
Full post as published by Phosita on August 04, 2010 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
State Will Statutes
State Differences in Last Will and Testament Checklist
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Rally Rights
Gettysburg Borough awards arrested protester $22,500 civil rights settlement.
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
False Claims
Attorney Robert Arledge ordered to pay $5.8 million after making false Fen Phen settlement claims.
LINA - Cigna Life Insurance Company of North America Disability Claims
LINA Insurance alleging violations of disability insurance claims.
John Vermillion and Associates LLC et al.
allegedly misrepresented themselves as qualified financial advisers to sell living trusts and exploit senior citizens.
St. John Health
Agrees a $13.5 Million Settlement in Antitrust Class Action

Taco Bell Sued for Slip and Fall
Taco Johns Black MacBook Review
ˇYo Quiero Taco Bell Dinero!: Restaurant Chain Loses Case Over Talking Chihuahua
Something awful happened at the Sedalia Taco Bell








