Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Religion Clause
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Religion ClauseCommercial Use of Part of Religious High School Not Protected By RLUIPA
By Howard M. Friedman
The inability of New Life to operate the fitness center and dance studio as a commercial business to generate funds to support the parish and the building of the high school does not pose any significant pressure on the members of New Life. The members of the church are not being asked to conform their behavior in practicing their religion, nor are the religious activities of the church being compromised.... [T]he denial of the special use permit to protect the students of the high school from the regular entry into the building by members of the general public is a compelling governmental interest. The Zoning Board is not denying New Life the opportunity to practice ancillary activities on the property, but rather disallowing open access to the high school building in fear of the potential danger to the students.
Full post as published by Religion Clause on July 11, 2010 (boomark / email).
Uniform Commercial Code and Contracts
Interstate commercial transactions and sale of goods in the United States
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Student Harassment
Wichita School District pays $45,000 settlement for high school students' harassment lawsuit.
Religious Decorations
Oklahoma City to pay attorney fees in religious freedom violations lawsuit.
Ellsworth School District
4.4% increase in salaries as part of contract settlement.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.
School Racism
School District pays $250,000 in racial harassment settlement.
School House Abuse
Selwyn House School agrees to $5 million teacher molestation settlement.

Commission Identification of RLUIPA Concerns Is Not Equivalent to Basing a Decision on RLUIPA
RLUIPA and Zoning Discrimination
Churchs SRO Use Protected Under RLUIPA but Landmarking Law Did Not Violate RLUIPA








