Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> AdamsDrafting
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: AdamsDraftingWhen the Deal Signs and Closes Simultaneously But the Contract Is Structured for a Deferred Closing
By Ken Adams
In a phone call with a law-firm M&A partner today, I was reminded that sometimes M&A contracts reflect a deferred closing even though the parties actually do a simultanous signing and closing.
If the signing and closing are simultaneous, the contract would usually contain deal provisions, representations, indemnification provisions (unless the target is public), and boilerplate, as well as any post-closing obligations.
If the closing is scheduled to take place sometime after signing, the contract would typically also contain obligations to be performed before closing, conditions that have to be satisfied before the parties will be required to consummate the transaction, and termination provisions. These additional components greatly complicate matters. It would be unfortunate to use a deferred-closing structure for a deal that uses a simultaneous signing and closing?you’d spend time building an elaborate structure that ultimately not only proves to be useless but also adds confusing clutter.
In the early stages of any deal, it may be unclear whether the closing will be deferred. In that case, it may be that you have to draft for a deferred closing, so as to keep your options open?it would be awkward to convert a deal from a simultaneous-signing-and-closing structure to a deferred-closing structure. But if you find that you’re able to do a simultaneous signing and closing, I’d then strip down the contract accordingly.
I recall someone’s once suggesting that even with a simultaneous signing and closing, it’s best to use a deferred-closing structure because it’s useful to have the contract contain a list of closing conditions?in this context, that means a list of (1) anything that would have to be in place before the parties sign and (2) any items to be exchanged at signing. But you can incorporate that kind of list without imposing on the contract an all-out deferred-closing structure.
Any thoughts?
Full post as published by AdamsDrafting on July 06, 2010 (boomark / email).
Uniform Commercial Code and Contracts
Interstate commercial transactions and sale of goods in the United States
Employment Contracts
General Contract Law Principles
Jevic Transportation
allegedly failing to give 60 days warning before closing plant.
Hurricane Claims
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. reaches settlement deal with Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood.
Inmate Medical Negligence
Olmsted County awards former inmate $337,000 settlement after failing to get him to a hospital after showing signs of a heart attack.
AnchorBank
$1.27 million in construction contract termination lawsuit.
Ram Publishing
alleging phone book advertising contract fraud.
Ellsworth School District
4.4% increase in salaries as part of contract settlement.

NSSTA Scandal as Member Creates Structured Settlements AND Secretly Acts As "Cash Now Pusher"!!!!
Secondary Structured Settlement Market Get 6.34% payments from AAA rated carrier!
Did Mistakes in the JPM-Bear Contract Help Lead to Renegotiation
More on "Deferred" Law Firm Employment and Breach of Contract:
"Justices Disagree Over Closing Court's Front Entrance"









