Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Jottings By An Employer's Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: Jottings By An Employer's LawyerRelational Retaliation: More Than A Mouthful, Another Step Forward?
By Michael W. Fox, Esq.
Jon is understandably concerned that the Supreme Court granted certiorari yesterday in this case, noting in what if anything is an understatement that "this Court has proven itself favorable to employee rights in retaliation claims." Check out his post. Supreme Court agrees to hear associational association retaliation claim, for links to his past coverage and his promise to follow this one through next term's argument and decision.
However, this is ultimately a question of statutory construction, which calls to mind Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education, where the dispute was whether Title IX prohibited retaliation, although there was no anti-retaliation provision in the statute itself. In a 5-4 decision, the court's opinion finding retaliation was prohibited was authored by Justice O'Connor. Significantly one of the dissenters was Justice Anthony Kennedy.
Although that was only five years ago, there will be four new justices on the Court that decides North American Stainless, Justices Roberts, Alito, Sotomayor and presumably Kagan. Substitute Sotomayor and Kagan for Souter and Stephens, Roberts for Rehnquist and Alito for O'Connor and if Kennedy's vote had remained the same Jackson would have gone the other way. So maybe North American Stainless will be better for employers than one might think on first blush.
Full post as published by Jottings By An Employer's Lawyer on June 29, 2010 (boomark / email).
Step 2
Recalls Play Gym Sets Sold Exclusively at Toys R Us
Music Teacher
College of the Desert agrees to $660,000 discrimination and retaliation settlement.
Police Whistleblower
Officer awarded $980,000 for whistleblower violations and retaliation.
Police Chief Whistleblower
Argentine Township agrees to pay former employee $650,000 harassment and retaliation settlement.
Whistleblower Retaliation
Frankfort to pay $500,000 settlement in employment lawsuit.
Employee Retaliation
UPS pays $254,000 settlement in whistleblower lawsuit.

Strandburg on Relational Surveillance
Rosati on Moral Objectivism & Relational Good
Powell on the Relational Concept of Security
Badawi on Relational Governance & Contract Damages








