ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Marler Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Marler Blog

ConAgra - Is the issue really that your customers are dumb or is it that your product has shit in it?

By E. coli Lawyer

ADVERTISEMENTS

Please remember, Salmonella is a fecal bacterium, and seriously, do any of us really expect to have a fecal bacterium in a product like this?

Also, remember, it is not like I do not know ConAgra, or respect some of the people that run the organization. Two years ago I spent a good part of a day explaining (from my perspective) why and how prior ConAgra outbreaks had occurred and 'why it is a bad idea to poison your customer.' Now, we are at it again in yet another outbreak, this time a Marie Callender's frozen entrée.  From the Portland paper:

Teresa Paulsen, a spokeswoman for ConAgra, said: …

Some of the ingredients, in particular the protein such as the chicken, are precooked before packaging. She said the package has explicit instructions on how to cook the entree in a microwave or oven.

"If it's cooked according to package instructions, any pathogen would be killed," she said.

"He said he cooked it normally," Marler said. "This time one had salmonella in it." … Marler said the consumer should not have to be responsible for killing any bacteria through cooking. "You can't expect the customer to be the kill step," he said.

Does this sound a bit too familiar? It sounds too much like to coverage given ConAgra during the last frozen dinner Salmonella outbreak in 2008 (sickened over 400 – about 1/3 sickened AFTER the 'recall') where ConAgra's PR machine trotted out the 'blaming the victim strategy.' At least when ConAgra sickened over 700 in 2007 (again, about 1/3 sickened AFTER the 'recall') with Salmonella-tainted peanut butter, they did not blame the customer. Even when ConAgra sickened 40 and killed an Ohio woman in 2002 with E. coli-tainted hamburger, it did not blame the consumer.

Why with frozen meals? Would it not be better to get the shit out of the product BEFORE it reaches the consumer?  I guess we will see what shakes out during the 2010 litigation.

Full post as published by Marler Blog on June 23, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0151 secs (new cache)