ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sex Offender Issues, News, Recidivism and Studies

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Criminal Law

: Sex Offender Issues, News, Recidivism and Studies

Changes in sex offender laws means fewer restrictions for some, more for others

By "eAdvocate"

ADVERTISEMENTS
Leave it to the media to make things more confusing, the law does not speak of "when a person was arrested" or "crimes committed before 2003," The law is based on when the offender was "convicted." (See HB 571 "convictions occurring" ... The odd part of the new bill relates to "July 1 2008" where it switches to "if the act was committed on or after July 1 2008" ...) (The bill then gets weirder

Full post as published by Sex Offender Issues, News, Recidivism and Studies on June 13, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Dumb New York Laws
Stupid Laws in the Empire State

Dumb Texas Laws
Stupid Laws in the Lone Star State

Dumb California Laws
Stupid Laws in the Sunshine State

Dumb Foreign Laws
Stupid Laws of Other Countries

Sex Offender Lists
Registries by State and County

Lawsuits and Settlements

Florida, USA
alleging restrictions too tight on Medicaid recipients.

California Labor Laws
alleged violations of California labor laws such as overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.

Grubb & Ellis
alleging violations of fiduciary duties to shareholders and securities laws.

Hewlett-Packard and Staples
allegedly violated antitrust laws in collaborating on the sale of replacement ink jet printer cartridges.

Damaged Billboards
Lamar Advertising pays $35,000 settlement after violating permit laws.

ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.014 secs (new cache)