Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Family Law Blogs -> Mississippi Family Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Family Law
: Mississippi Family Law BlogMississippi Supreme Court finds law firm not liable for partner's affair with client's wife
By Robert M. Kisselburgh, Esq.
Law firm escapes liability for partner's affair
This last week the Mississippi Supreme Court issued an opinion reversing a Hinds County Circuit Court's ruling in an alienation of affection lawsuit involving an attorney and his law firm. You might ask how a law firm became a defendant in an alienation of affection lawsuit. Well, one of the firm's partners had an affair with the plaintiff's wife. Worse, the plaintiff said the partner was his attorney at the time of the affair. When the plaintiff found out about the affair (a point disputed in the testimony), he decided to bring a lawsuit against the attorney and his employer, the law firm.
Normally this would be a straight-forward case as the Mississippi Supreme Court has previously ruled that an employer cannot be held responsible for an affair of one of its employees. This makes sense given an extramarital affair is not in the course and scope of one's employment and does nothing in furtherance of the employer's business. And that is what the Court ruled especially given there was no evidence that anyone at the law firm knew about the affair. The Court also ruled that summary judgment was proper for the other claims against the law firm.
What made this case different is a lawyer owes his client a fiduciary duty. If an attorney violates that fiduciary duty, then the attorney can be held liable. And in some circumstances, the law firm of the attorney can be held liable. That is what the plaintiff was attempting to prove in this case. Essentially, he was arguing that the attorney breached his fiduciary duty by having an affair with his wife. The Supreme Court disagreed. One judge dissented on the fiduciary duty claim, stating it was a jury question. I agree. Two judges did not participate in the opinion.
Moral of the story: In an alienation of affection lawsuit, you are not going to be able to sue the employer of the paramour.
Reported by Robert Kisselburgh, Mississippi Divorce Lawyer
Full post as published by Mississippi Family Law Blog on June 12, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Sharon Collins
found guilty of conspiring to kill her partner
Bank Website Security
New Report Finds Widespread Flaws
Daimler Chrysler et al.
alleged negligence pertaining to lost confidential client data which exposed customers to identity theft
Mississippi Antitrust
Costs Microsoft $100 Million
Celebrity Chef
John Burton Race ordered to pay wife $7.2 million divorce settlement.
State Farm
Settles with Mississippi Attorney General

Law Firm, Partner Dodge Bullet Over Affair With Client's Wife
Court Affirms Verdict Against Lawyer for Affair With Client's Wife
Lawyer liable when client pursues illegitimate claim
LG fights negligence case involving former partner's wife








