Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> TinytechIP
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: TinytechIPUS Patent 7728284 - Polarized optical nanotweezers
Two of the primary techniques used to manipulate individual nanoparticles are atomic force microscopy and optical tweezers. This patent from Japan Science and Technology Agency teaches a method of using optical tweezers on groups of quantum dots. Claim 1 reads:
1. A method of manipulating nanosize objects, said method comprising: illuminating nanosize objects with light resonant with an electronic excitation level of the nanosize objects to induce force being exerted on the nanosize objects from the resonant light for manipulation of the nanosize objects, wherein: the resonant light illuminates a collection of nanosize objects; the resonant light is changed in polarization to control mechanical interaction of the nanosize objects; and the resonant light is changed in polarization so as to excite resonance energy of closely positioned nanosize objects to a level below resonance energy of a single nanosize object.
Full post as published by TinytechIP on June 08, 2010 (boomark / email).
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment
Qualcomm Settles Patent Suit for $891 Million
The Princeton Review
$2.6 million settlement reached in patent infringement case.

In a Polarized Court, Getting the Last Word
Inventorship dispute between Future Fiber Technologies and Optellios
"In a Polarized Court, Getting the Last Word"
Defense verdict in patent case in Marshall; trial stats so far in 2009
On Polarized Prices and Costly Sequential Search








