Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing

Litigation

: How Appealing

"Detainees Barred From Access to U.S. Courts"

"Detainees Barred From Access to U.S. Courts": Charlie Savage has this front page article today in The New York Times.

In today's edition of The Los Angeles Times, David G. Savage and Christi Parsons have an article headlined "Court: No habeas rights for prisoners in Afghanistan; Obama wins what Bush sought: the right to hold suspects without judicial oversight at the Bagram air base."

Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers has an article headlined "Court: Bagram prisoners don't have Guantanamo habeas rights."

Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor reports that "Detainees held by US in Afghanistan can't contest custody, court finds; Friday's ruling is a victory for the US government, which seeks to hold enemy combatants indefinitely at Afghanistan's Bagram Air Base; Detainees' lawyers had argued for judicial oversight."

Evan Perez of The Wall Street Journal reports that "Court Rules Against Detainees at Bagram."

And at "The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times," Marcia Coyle has a post titled "Bagram Detainees Have No Habeas Rights."

Full post as published by How Appealing on May 22, 2010 (boomark / email).