ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Family Law Blogs -> Ohio Family Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Family Law

: Ohio Family Law Blog

Marital Consequences of the Repeal of Federal Estate Tax

By Joseph E. Balmer

ADVERTISEMENTS

estatetaxrepeal.jpgTo the surprise of everyone in the estate planning community, Congress failed to address a critical estate and generation-skipping tax matter before the end of 2009, resulting in the repeal of the federal estate tax.  However, this repeal is for 2010 only.  In 2011, the exclusion for federal estate tax reverts back to $1,000,000.  How is this possible, and what effect does it have on couples? estate plans, particularly second marriages?

Since 2001, the federal estate tax has been gradually phasing out, with an increasing exclusion from federal estate tax each year.  In 2009, the exclusion increased to $3,500,000. In 2010 however, the federal estate tax disappears, only to return in 2011 with only a $1,000,000 exclusion.  To further complicate things, although the federal estate tax disappears in 2010, the unlimited step-up in basis for inherited assets also disappears; and a decedent?s estate is permitted to increase the basis of assets by only up to a total of $1.3 million with an additional $3 million if there is a surviving spouse.  How does this affect estate planning?

Many couples? estate plans were written to shelter the exclusion at the death of the first spouse by using a ?by-pass? or ?shelter credit? trust, and having the balance pass to a spouse (in trust or outright)  or possibly to the children of a first marriage.  Under the current law, the credit shelter trust may be either underfunded or overfunded or, in 2010, not funded at all because no exclusion amount applies.  With estate plans for second marriages where often an individual wants to provide for both a spouse and children from a first marriage, if nothing is allocated to the credit shelter trust (for the benefit of one group of beneficiaries) then everything will go to the remaining group of beneficiaries, and the result may certainly be something other than what was intended.  In 2011, when the exclusion is no longer unlimited but reverts back to $1,000,000, a completely different but equally problematic group of issues arise, also possibly resulting in an estate plan other than what was initially desired.

If you have a trust or trust language in your will, you need to be aware of these issues.  You should have your estate plan reviewed by your estate planning attorney, particularly if your immediate health is an issue, to make sure that it effectuates your intentions and wishes.  It also does not hurt to try to follow this topic in the news.  Congress will eventually address these issues, probably either this year or next.  We just don?t know when or what will be the end result. Stay tuned to our blog and we will report any new developments!

Full post as published by Ohio Family Law Blog on March 13, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0133 secs (new cache)